Search results

Nice effort 👍

reality of people who tried to defame Khaps https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/delhi/love-commandos-owner-arrested-for-confining-extorting-money-from-couples/articleshow/67755909.cms

This a well known fact that Mahabharata has been expanded and rewritten many times from Jay Samita to bharata to Mahabharata ...a story that contained 10000 salokas changed to 100000 number epic. Even the mention of Hunas suggest interpolation as late as fifth century.. We have with us a very...

Writer clearly mention it on Dakshinpatha that omits dwarka that is on eastern side.

Kuru Kingdom or even Kurukeshtra had never been in India ,even town Kurukshetra was earlier knowwn by Thanesar not Kurukshetra.

So now you suggest that even Dwarka village too was asked by Pandavas ..in addition to Sonipat panipat Indarpat and tilpat...That makes it ^6 villages not five.:) No Kusasthala always stood for Xinjiang province in northwestern China historically there is hardly any doubt over that.

Vrika in Sanskrit mean Bhedia not Bagh or Vyaghr...so faulty assumption by Mahipal Arya 100% True and that is what I wrote in my earlier post. Point is name given in Mahabharata text is Virkasathala.....not Virkaparshtha or Vyagrprashtha....and Virkasathala as you observed is same that...

And yes Panipat Sonipat Bhaghpat etc etc are mere stories fabricated with out an iota of truth in it:)

Quoting lines from Udyoga parva of Mahabharata... In this chapter of the Udyoga Parva of the Mahabharata, Yudhishthira sends an offer of peace to Duryodhana, and in the course of doing so he names the five villages:We are desirous of peace; give us even a single province of the empire. Give us...

True...............

Rash conclusions.. Mahabharata war in 1900 to 2000BC??? Earlier site in sanoli is harppan,So How can we fit Mahabharata in Harppan era? And yes Mahabharata was fought Iran &Central Asian lands not India .We just have a twisted one sided version of that war with us.

Being humble and open to suggestions , is a great virtue, possessed only by true intellectuals.:)

True Feroze was a Parsi not Muslim and Parsi and Vedic religion are just mirror image ,Hindu religion all together is a different thing.

This thread was an opportunity to explore true faith and religious inclination of Jat Kaum ,but midway ...discussions were hijacked by political activists and thread lost all purpose and sense.

https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/im-first-indian-pm-you-came-out-of-beijing-to-receive-pm-narendra-modi-to-xi-jinping-in-wuhan/articleshow/63940029.cms What is this? Always bragging and addressing voters....

Aapko bhi or sabhi Jatland members ko bahut bahut Subhkamnaye :). Never too late:)

True. It's a routine on foreign trips. Instead of hearing PM of India we find a party leader addressing election rally. So old gang still active.:)

Really sad to see the quality of discussion in such an important section. Pure guesswork and tukkafication presented as History of Jats

Agree to that .

Shafer is just the interpreter of sources ,I wanted to know his rationale of denying Jartika mentioned in current versions since you read that any way I would go through his work and see his logic..any way what about other geographers Ptolmey Strabo and foreign writers why not Jetae ,Messagetae ??