PDA

View Full Version : Shortage of officers in Indian Army 'scary'


sampuran
February 2nd, 2006, 02:32 PM
Shortage of officers in Indian Army 'scary': Expert

February 02, 2006 13:35 IST

http://ia.rediff.com/news/2006/feb/02army.htm
Describing the shortage of officers in the Indian Army as the 'most critical' and 'scary' problem, a security expert has asked the government to attract the youth by offering them post-retirement 'lateral induction' into paramilitary and police services, a move which would not only continue their employment but also provide these forces trained and experienced manpower.
"The most critical problem the Indian military faces today is the huge shortage of officers. Particularly, the levels of deficit at 25 per cent for Army is scary," Indian Defence Review journal Editor Bharat Verma said in the editorial of the latest issue.
The problem was 'scary' because it comes at a time when the army was not only involved in protecting the vast borders and fighting insurgency in Jammu and Kashmir and the Northeast on a day-to-day basis, but the officers' shortage was at the levels where it hurts most - lieutenants, captains and majors - the ranks that give the cutting edge leadership on ground without which no General can win a battle, leave alone a war, he said.
Observing that the prevailing practice of ensuring that every officer reached the rank of at least a Colonel would result in bloating of the senior echelons of the Army, Verma said within a few years, 'it would be natural that expectations will enhance and the limit is raised to a Brigadier.' This, however, will still not attract the youth to join the military, he added.
Given the growing menace of terrorism and internal violence, Verma said commonality between the army on one hand and police and paramilitary on the other should be considered, instead of commonality between police-paramilitary forces and the bureaucracy.
"Lateral induction is the only way to attract the young but savvy population to the toughest profession where risk-to-life factor is an everyday affair. Once they (army officers) know that after a short and demanding tenure they have an assured career elsewhere, with seniority of service intact, and their family will not be on the roads, the deficit in officer cadre will disappear," he said.
"Similarly, a jawan after ten-year tenure must be laterally inducted into paramilitary, coast guard, marine police and the central and state police set-ups. It is necessary to create that we create and maintain a lean and mean fighting machine," the strategic expert said.
Modernisation of the armed forces required not only induction of sophisticated weapons, equipment and systems, but also infusion of fresh manpower so as to retain the requisite youthful zeal - a key determinant of military prowess, Verma said, adding that among the advantages would be the transfer of disciplined, trained and skilled manpower to the civil set-up.
Pointing to the strange mindset that guarding the borders was the sole responsibility of the security forces, which had little relevance to the civil society and other professions, he said leaders like Mahatma Gandhi, Nehru, Subhash Chandra Bose and Morarji Desai were among several leaders who had flirtations with the uniform while being part of the British Ambulance Corps, the University Corps or the Training Corps.
"Awareness and appreciation of military matters among Indians is imperative if India is to become a key player in Asia. It would also serve as an antidote to casteism and communalism," Verma said.



Press and the Army hav been drawing the attention of the policy makers and people towards this situation for the last many years. But no government has taken any concrete steps to reduce the shortage.
Why are we so careless towards a matter of vital national security ?
Will the latest move to assure every officer a promotion to the rank of Lt Colonel help ?
Should not all aspirants of civil services be mandatorily be required to serve with the Army for five years ? This will increase the number of officers in junior ranks and also provide the required exposure to all civil servants on aspects of defence.
The scheme of lateral induction should be more applied to lower ranks and for officers above the rank of colonel. If the later are inducted into civil services then experienced, learned and battle hardened soldiers get to have a say in policy matters.
Members please share your thoughts. Thanks.

raj2rif
February 4th, 2006, 05:06 AM
Dear Sampuran Singh Ji,
The issue raised by you through this article is very important but an old issue. I remember when I joined my unit in 1977, I was the 22 officer joining the unit against 21 authorized at that time. Off course we had our share of Low Medical Category Officers being at a peace location. But when we did move to field we still had a Captain with 12 plus years of service, since substantive major's rank was to be achieved only after 13 years of service. I rememer one of our officer was picked up as ADC of a Divisional Commander, but inspite of having close to 5 years service he still was a Lt. since there were no vacancies in the rank of Captain in our unit.
This was the situation between 1977 and 1983. During this period many short service commissioned officers did not get permanent commission.
As against this, in 1993 we moved to Kupwara with 10 officers. With great efforts our strength was boosted up to 13-14 at one time for a short period. Most of the officers were very junior and some fresh from the academy. I was the only substantive major in the unit and was doing the duties of second in command as well as one of the company commander. When it was my turn to command the unit, I had a strength of 8 officers. Maximum I achieved for a short duration of my command was I think 10.
The question is why we have landed up in this situation and what are the remedies we need to take.

First point first why such a situation:

Army is no longer considered the best profession by the youth. The continueous insurgency and use of army for aid to civil authorities has taken a toll of army officers in specially in the Infantry. Thus the glamour of the army when a young officer was moving on his "Yezdi" with shuolders shining with brass is no longer the case in cantonments.

The pay structure has never been good enough to match their civilian counter parts. Not only that, even in the protocol army stands poor third to comparative civil services. The rigrous of the insurgency and field conditions have not given enough time for officers to develop themselves adequately. This has also resulted in many of them loosing out in the race for selection grade promotion. Giving higher rank to Coy Cdr is no achievement. Give him more pay and better living conditions. I remember, MES has eaten the military. You don't get acomodation in time and when you get it, it is substandard and not maintained properly. I would say, army itself is to be responsible for such a state of affairs.

Acutally, I can write a lot on this subject, but time is the constraint.

The solution:

The entire nation need to serve a five year term in the military before getting out to any other profession: Be it a factory worker, teacher, software professional, IAS, IPC, or any other post. Based on their qualifications he/she should be absorbed in the rank suitable for his calibre.
Each one of them should serve at least 2 to 3 years in field in active operations. The best could be retained in military. Those who under perform wiht a view to get out soon/for better professions, should be debarred from getting in to more lucrative professions. The report they earn during their stint in military should be one of the deciding criteria for their lateral induction in other civil services.

All those who get selected in the rank of officers,should be given enough time for their professional development to meet the challanges of the civil services.

There are more things those can be done.

The outcome of this will be, that we would be able to meet the shortage of the officers, and will be able to provide a relatively disciplined work force for our civil servicesd who has seen the hardships of the soldiers and the remote areas of our country.