PDA

View Full Version : Suicides in Indian Armed Forces


chhillar
June 17th, 2006, 02:44 AM
The number of suicides by military personnel is on the rise. We have tons of Jatlanders who are from these organizations; can we please know what could be there reasons behind these unfortunate incidents? Is it just the work pressure resulting into poor mental health or is there something wrong with military as an organization itself, I mean the military's emphasis on honor, valor and courage should make suicide perhaps one of its last taboos, shouldn't it?

Rise in suicides in military is not limited to just India, look at US troops in Iraq and Afghanistan; the numbers are on the rise there too.

Above all why military would never release the results of investigations of such suicides to public?

Note: Please don't take this thread as an opportunity to put our military people on a hard-hitting spot. We are proud of them!

drjatin
June 17th, 2006, 05:36 AM
Well iwill like to say it is prevelent in all fields be it militiary engineering schools or colleges it is a propblem present in human race!
In my opinion they are common in people who are at the other end of spectrum in terms of handling stress and criricism or may be genetically related!

spdeshwal
June 17th, 2006, 11:03 AM
Chhillar bhai,

"Satey preshaan kar deta hai praast nahi"

Saayad issi jajbe ki kami ki vajah se kuchh log haar maan lete hein aur aatamhatya jaise dukhad raasta apna lete hein.

I believe, the incident which has provoked you to iniyiate this thread is the tragic death of Lt.Sushmita Ckakarvarti who commited suicide.
The suicide note shows that she was unable to cope with the routine life of the Army. As stated by her brother she was always uncomfortable to arrange or to be part of party culture in the Army.

This sad event has provoked the debate again that whether we should have women in Armed forces at all?Although most of the developed countries have fairly good percentage of females in their Armed forces but their presence in Indian Armed forces is neglible. Also some of the Female officers have proved their metal with examplary courage during Kargil and after.

I would request our Serving and non serving officers to comment on this.

Cheers!

jagmohan
June 19th, 2006, 12:42 PM
Dear All,

The reasons are:

1. Poor Training to Young Officers and Recruits. The training is not as 'Hard' as it used to be.

2. Treating Army Service like any other job and not a 'Way of Life'. Not many join the Army because they want to. Also they anticipate an easier life.

3. Poor Leadership at all levels: Soldier to General.

4. Unable to take the hardships in stride. The communication boom has resulted in a very adverse situation in the Armed Forces, specially for those on the borders. A 'Fauji' now wants to speak to his family/wife everyday because a such facilities exist. This distracts them.

5. The women officers are treated like a ceremonial commodity by most HQs.

6. The Army was not prepared psychologically before induction of women. A MCP attitude still exists.

7. Most suicides rates are due to stress caused by military duties combined with neglect of basic leadership qualities.

8. Middle level officers (Majors to Colonels) are unable to meet the illogoical demands of Commanders in a counter insurgency scenario. That's why we have cases of fake encounters for gallantry.

9. Not easy to lead a difficult life.

Regards,

JS Malik

sampuran
June 19th, 2006, 06:51 PM
I would agree with most of the points by Col Jagmohanji. In addition

Young people join the armed forces with lot of expectations. But they dont find it as well paying, no quick promotions or glory, no grteat authority or money power to influence things inside or outside.

For some like this lady officer who was Msc Chemistry, the job itself may be boring/ demeaning to their intellect.

Finally, I dont know whether there is psychological toughening and indoctrination to face the physical hardships and insecurity at one end,, .. and to drill in the spirit of Service before Self, at the other.

naresh.mehta
June 19th, 2006, 09:44 PM
I pretty much agree with u sir..

Basically I am afraid to say Army is losing the Elite touch now.. The young officers who though are resepeted and admired among civilans esp the fairer section are internally suffering with this problem of low salary!

Thanks to IT boom n other private sectors , Army job doesnt hold the same stand in the society.. though ofcourse the many facilities provided and the personality of an officer is anyday far superior than that of a geeky S/w fellow..
But the bottom line is 'job satisfaction' ... If a person really enjoys walking proudly in the green smart uniform of army , he wud never be dissatisfied n cajoled by the mere cash of private sector..

I am from defence background.. many of the members are army officers , the latest being my brother ( 63 engineers) , and my family takes pride in being a part of the defence... jokingly they admit n use cliches like 'fauji ke paas kya bachta hai yaar... whiskey peete nahi wo hi bach jati hai !'
but i knw they luv being in army!

i myself were in sainik sch , chittor.. but then bcoz brother had already joined CME.. i was forced to leave sainik sch n prepare of iitjee...

The basic reason of suicide is the 'ill treatment' in the name of discipline.. many superceded n frustrated officers take false prode in demaning n spoiling the ACRs of young officers.. n the irony is that the junior cant complain out of protocol..
lot of shady stuff .. n then the creeping corruption !

God save army... and let the new generation take some interest in serving the nation in the best way !

chhillar
June 19th, 2006, 10:29 PM
i myself were in sainik sch , chittor.. but then bcoz brother had already joined CME.. i was forced to leave sainik sch n prepare of iitjee...

I cousin is from the same school, Lt Col. SP Singh Malik, Mahar Reg.
I am from sainik school Kunjpura.

naresh.mehta
June 19th, 2006, 11:56 PM
Good to see u sir!

LtCol Malik... well if i cud know his 'house' .. warna thoda fight hai

Bak then in their time.. which wud ve been probably ... early 80s ... the selections were like 20 a batch.. now it is 4 a batch!!! frm SSC.. though i heard recently situation is improving!

sampuran
June 20th, 2006, 01:32 PM
I pretty much agree with u sir..

Basically I am afraid to say Army is losing the Elite touch now.. The young officers who though are resepeted and admired among civilans esp the fairer section are internally suffering with this problem of low salary!

Thanks to IT boom n other private sectors , Army job doesnt hold the same stand in the society.. though ofcourse the many facilities provided and the personality of an officer is anyday far superior than that of a geeky S/w fellow..
But the bottom line is 'job satisfaction' ... If a person really enjoys walking proudly in the green smart uniform of army , he wud never be dissatisfied n cajoled by the mere cash of private sector..

I am from defence background.. many of the members are army officers , the latest being my brother ( 63 engineers) , and my family takes pride in being a part of the defence... jokingly they admit n use cliches like 'fauji ke paas kya bachta hai yaar... whiskey peete nahi wo hi bach jati hai !'
but i knw they luv being in army!

i myself were in sainik sch , chittor.. but then bcoz brother had already joined CME.. i was forced to leave sainik sch n prepare of iitjee...

The basic reason of suicide is the 'ill treatment' in the name of discipline.. many superceded n frustrated officers take false prode in demaning n spoiling the ACRs of young officers.. n the irony is that the junior cant complain out of protocol..
lot of shady stuff .. n then the creeping corruption !

God save army... and let the new generation take some interest in serving the nation in the best way !

Some years back Army had launched media blitz to attract promising youngmen & women with the Ad campaign - DO YOU HAVE IT IN YOU

& OFFICER FOR FIVE YEARS AND GENTLEMAN FOR LIFE.

Seems they attract people all right, but jacked up the expectations sky high.

raj2rif
June 20th, 2006, 03:05 PM
Dear All,

An interesting topic and some good answers. Col Malik had tried to answer most of them.

The main reason as per my perception is not the atmosphere in the army itself, but society. Some suicides get blown up some go un-noticed. We had a Maj Gen dying by falling in the Sena Bhawan from some high floor. (I think it was Maj Gen A. Malik) I also had L/Nk/Ck Selvaraj committing suicide in my own unit. While I don't know the reasons for Gen Malik's suicide, I do know exactly what led to Selvaraj committing suicide. Analyze yourself:

Nov 25th I interview Selvaraj joining my unit from another Raj Rif bn, which moved to Siachen, as Selvaraj was a medical category. During the CO's interview he said that he can't lift heavy weight. My directions, report to officers mess (rather than company cook house, I sent a cook from mess to company) since we just had two officers in dining in mess while we had full quota of cooks in mess. Prepare a south indian dish when ever you can and bring it to me. Few days later, Selvaraj comes to office with a mess waiter, having prepared excellent WADA and Coffee and we all officers relish it during tea break. Selvaraj is extremely happy.
10th December he gets admitted to Military Hospital. 25th December gets discharged, Night 31st December/1st January, Selvaraj Commits Suicide.

Investigations revealed:

Selvaraj was to go home on medical ground in 1991, but had a few years service left to get the pension. His company commander did a favor to him by keeping him in the unit and sheltering him from the hard work. Selvaraj continues to serve inspite of being physically unfit to do so. Meanwhile (six years from the day he should have gone home) he continued to develop other ailments. His body pains had increased so much that he could not even sleep on the charpoy. He was sleeping on the floor (problem of command: my jat boys sharing the barracks with him never bothered to find out if he had any problem for to them he was "Madrasi")
We recovered his letters: He loved his younger brother, who wanted to go to Chennai to do his Masters degree, but was short of money. Selvaraj was trying his best to send him the money what ever he could. His brother was the only help his wife had at his native village. His brother had written some letters where the crux was that Selvaraj was unable to support his family as well as others could do. One day his brother took all the Jewellery from the home and went to Chennai to pursue his studies or whatever. He gets the letter from his wife and few days later commits suicide.
Now, the problem: What does army atmosphere had to do with this. Not all the truth comes out in most cases. I was pressured to shield one of my young officer, who stole a gold chain of his collegue during YO's course and later on faked a check of brother officer of another unit. To my surprise the CO of another unit also wanted me to sheild the officer as he was son of an army officer. I did get him court marshalled.
The problem I feel is that the actions are not taken when the problem is small. We continue moving forward leaving a lot of dust behind us. Some thing we call "Bhus pe leepna".

The training of troops and specially officers has a lot to do with this. Some times people say we don't have time to train. May be true, but do we actually train when whatever little time we have?

In my entire service, during any training I never saw any one teaching how to actually assault during attack. Every thing is there in the books, and explained beautifully by instructors at squad posts. Not many know it how to conduct on ground specially when actual bullets are flying. I am proud to say that I did teach my boys as a company commander, exactly how it is to be done. They did not like it then, but did excelled in all exercises as well as in Kargil. They were the first company to capture the objective in Kargil. If you train your troops well, I find no reason, they resorting to the cowardly acts of committing suicide. But more often than not we try to sheild the weak links in the system and are not courageous enough to take corrective actions when there is still time.

sampuran
June 22nd, 2006, 01:46 PM
Dear All,

An interesting topic and some good answers. Col Malik had tried to answer most of them.The main reason as per my perception is not the atmosphere in the army itself, but society.

If you train your troops well, I find no reason, they resorting to the cowardly acts of committing suicide. But more often than not we try to sheild the weak links in the system and are not courageous enough to take corrective actions when there is still time.

Dear Col Tewatiaji
I would agree with you. Only the wordings were different. This is what I had written above -

"Finally, I dont know whether there is psychological toughening and indoctrination to face the physical hardships and insecurity at one end,, .. and to drill in the spirit of Service before Self, at the other."


People say that suicide is cowardly... may be. But think of the pressure on the individual who can not see an honourable way out of his misery !

raj2rif
June 23rd, 2006, 12:41 AM
Dear Sampuran Singh Ji,

Toughening of mind is certainly the issue. Taking one's life is probably is very difficult and probably the last decision one makes for if he does not survive he/she is just done.

Every organization has a training model and so do the armed forces. I would say every house has a model to train the children. While individuals may have their own weaknesses and strengths, it is the organizational problem in a group dynamics that may need to be addressed. I personally feel sheilding the weak links and just postponing the problems does not serve the purpose well. Purely it is because this reason they say "Justic delayed is justice denied". If we can listen to the affected person preferrably sympathetically, and then advise him or make him thing about the possible alternative solutions, I feel the problem can be reduced to some extent. The cases will still be occuring, but certainly we can reduce the possibility of these occurances.

sampuran
June 23rd, 2006, 03:02 PM
Dear Sampuran Singh Ji,

Toughening of mind is certainly the issue. Taking one's life is probably is very difficult and probably the last decision one makes for if he does not survive he/she is just done.

Every organization has a training model and so do the armed forces. I would say every house has a model to train the children. While individuals may have their own weaknesses and strengths, it is the organizational problem in a group dynamics that may need to be addressed. I personally feel sheilding the weak links and just postponing the problems does not serve the purpose well. Purely it is because this reason they say "Justic delayed is justice denied". If we can listen to the affected person preferrably sympathetically, and then advise him or make him thing about the possible alternative solutions, I feel the problem can be reduced to some extent. The cases will still be occuring, but certainly we can reduce the possibility of these occurances.

Shreemanji, 100% agreement with you.
What you said in last couple of lines - does it hold good in today's army, talking generally ? Is it that people are getting on more with their lives and careers, and the old times cohesiveness is on the wane ?

Another point is, will it be better if the fauj can release people who want to say goodbye, without asking them to pay back for the training etc ? Like in this case, the lady offircr wasn't happy about the job. She could have been sent back to her home.

chhillar
June 23rd, 2006, 09:26 PM
Another point is, will it be better if the fauj can release people who want to say goodbye, without asking them to pay back for the training etc ? Like in this case, the lady offircr wasn't happy about the job. She could have been sent back to her home.

excellent point brought up here!

On the side, Can we have your picture here Sampuran bhai, haven't seen you for 18 years I guess after school.

raj2rif
June 24th, 2006, 02:13 AM
Another point is, will it be better if the fauj can release people who want to say goodbye, without asking them to pay back for the training etc ? Like in this case, the lady offircr wasn't happy about the job. She could have been sent back to her home.


Dear Sampuran Singh Ji,

I am not sure about the details of this particular case, however I would like to give my views on this issue. Ideally, when we don't have shortage of people willing to join army (specially in case of other ranks) then there is no point holding on to the unwilling people, in an organization where the compensation can never be enough for the task to be performed. However, each case still needs to be dealt with on merit. During my own service, I had a few cases where the soldier was absolutely unwilling to serve, but I was able to address there problem and they not only continued but also turned out to be one of the best in business. It all depends as to how the senior officer handles the problem.
Truely, army has a truncated budget and a lot to take care of. Ours is the army of volunters and thus if the officer had joined the armed forces, then she/he should atleast discuss it with people to find out the ways to help him/her while not wasting the precious money spent on her/his training.

It is a difficult question to answer. More often than not, I had seen most people take the requests of leaving the army in negative manner. If the person is explained the rules and the logic behind those rules and can motivate the person to fulfil his/ her terms of engagements or the obligation to the service and the nation, I feel, most problems can be solved.

Interestingly, when my unit was scheduled to go to high altitude, many of our soldiers got a low medical category rating from one of the doctor (airforce) posted at Jodhpur hospital. As luck could have it, the unit was slated to go for UN mission and that means all these Low Medical Category soldiers would have missed the opportunity to serve on UN mission and thus would have lost out on a lots of money. Guess what, most of them got their medical category upgraded from the same place to be fit to go with the unit to UN. I learnt that the doctor in question was doing all this for Rs 5000.00 each.
The best thing is that unit did not go to UN and instead went to High Altitude and that too in Insurgency area. All these soldiers landed up there.
The point I am trying to project is that most of us want to follow the path of least resistance. That is human nature. Most people want to avoid work if they can. Some time honesty is not one practices but a result of not getting the opportunities to become dishonest. As commanders we need to see the difference.
A lot can be written on man management, but I thing it is time to close. The problem is complex and has to be dealt with case by case as there may not be any generalized solution.

sampuran
June 26th, 2006, 05:48 PM
Dear Sampuran Singh Ji,

I am not sure about the details of this particular case, however I would like to give my views on this issue. Ideally, when we don't have shortage of people willing to join army (specially in case of other ranks) then there is no point holding on to the unwilling people, in an organization where the compensation can never be enough for the task to be performed. However, each case still needs to be dealt with on merit. During my own service, I had a few cases where the soldier was absolutely unwilling to serve, but I was able to address there problem and they not only continued but also turned out to be one of the best in business. It all depends as to how the senior officer handles the problem.
Truely, army has a truncated budget and a lot to take care of. Ours is the army of volunters and thus if the officer had joined the armed forces, then she/he should atleast discuss it with people to find out the ways to help him/her while not wasting the precious money spent on her/his training.

It is a difficult question to answer. More often than not, I had seen most people take the requests of leaving the army in negative manner. If the person is explained the rules and the logic behind those rules and can motivate the person to fulfil his/ her terms of engagements or the obligation to the service and the nation, I feel, most problems can be solved.

Interestingly, when my unit was scheduled to go to high altitude, many of our soldiers got a low medical category rating from one of the doctor (airforce) posted at Jodhpur hospital. As luck could have it, the unit was slated to go for UN mission and that means all these Low Medical Category soldiers would have missed the opportunity to serve on UN mission and thus would have lost out on a lots of money. Guess what, most of them got their medical category upgraded from the same place to be fit to go with the unit to UN. I learnt that the doctor in question was doing all this for Rs 5000.00 each.
The best thing is that unit did not go to UN and instead went to High Altitude and that too in Insurgency area. All these soldiers landed up there.
The point I am trying to project is that most of us want to follow the path of least resistance. That is human nature. Most people want to avoid work if they can. Some time honesty is not one practices but a result of not getting the opportunities to become dishonest. As commanders we need to see the difference.
A lot can be written on man management, but I thing it is time to close. The problem is complex and has to be dealt with case by case as there may not be any generalized solution.

Shreemanji
I wonder why many other COS or somemore superior people fail to follow simple rules of man management and motivation.
That story form your unit is interesting. It was all luck (or ill-luck) for the lazy ones!
But there are some bigger issue which the news wallahs dont understand because thats not sensational.

In 1947 army would have been a good career - pay and pension for life. pucca house with running water supply, well planned cantonments and other aminities. But today any established company provides you that. Or they give you enough money so that you can afford. Whereas the standards of these facilities has remain same in the fauj.
Then why should somebody join the fauj ?

Some people do for thrill or other motives than just job security. When they dont get that thrill because of whatever reason, they want to quit. In civil you can give a week or twos notice. Not same in fauj . Then fraustration must be even more. Otherwise, why should be a severe shortage of officers in fauj.. and many more ready to leave ?

Man mangement aside, isnt something basically wrong that people are not happy staying in the fauj ?

raj2rif
June 26th, 2006, 09:29 PM
Shreemanji
I wonder why many other COS or somemore superior people fail to follow simple rules of man management and motivation.
That story form your unit is interesting. It was all luck (or ill-luck) for the lazy ones!
But there are some bigger issue which the news wallahs dont understand because thats not sensational.

In 1947 army would have been a good career - pay and pension for life. pucca house with running water supply, well planned cantonments and other aminities. But today any established company provides you that. Or they give you enough money so that you can afford. Whereas the standards of these facilities has remain same in the fauj.
Then why should somebody join the fauj ?

Dear Sampuran Singh Ji,
I think army is still a good career. Off course there are flashy careers available outside. I never wanted to become an army officer. But that was the first job I got and I took it after discussing with my elder brothers who had tried several times to get commission in Army but failed in SSB. I took that decision and did not like the job for first two three years. Not for any other reasons, but for the reason, that the picture looked too different from outside and reality turned out to be different. My village back ground was a big handicap apart from me not having any God Father. However I was lucky to have few excellent seniors who not only help me become a good officer but also helped me to become a good human being. Today, I don't regret having joined army. In fact I keep telling my children that given a choice in next life, I would still like to become part of the same organization. Some people join it for fame (I would say not the thrill) and some like me join it for getting food at home and use it to get to the fame in the process. The choices are wide open. One has to just make a decision. Regarding money. I have already said that a soldier can never be paid enough for the work he / she does. Unfortunately, many military officers, civilian officers dealing with military affairs and in some cases soldiers themselves indulge in stealing and cheating their own brother soldiers. That is unfortunate.

Some people do for thrill or other motives than just job security. When they dont get that thrill because of whatever reason, they want to quit. In civil you can give a week or twos notice. Not same in fauj . Then fraustration must be even more. Otherwise, why should be a severe shortage of officers in fauj.. and many more ready to leave ?

Yes there is an acute shortage of officers. The army itself had tried to solve that problem by introducing the Regimental Commission ( I personally had been against it for various reasons and can give detailed opinion separately on that issue). More often than not the leaders/Sr. Officers went in for a temporary solution. We do have a budget, we do have a commitment and we do have the scarece resources in terms of man and material. But I don't think the problem is too difficult to solve. The problem is GREED of people in the chain, at every level.
I was told by one of my collegue that if you can't correct the system, then join it. That is what most people end up doing. However while the course of no resistance may give them some physical comforts and monetory gains, they lose out heavily on their identity. They also become party to ruin the prospects of their own future generations.

Man mangement aside, isnt something basically wrong that people are not happy staying in the fauj ?

I think both man and material managements are the issue in any organization to keep the team happy.

chhillar
June 26th, 2006, 10:36 PM
Loads of good information Tawathia saab, Sampuran bhai. I am glad I started this thread. Wonder why other fauji bhai are not writting anything, is it against the law or something?

sampuran
June 30th, 2006, 04:03 PM
Tewathiaji, Thanks for the patient replies.
I guess gone are the days of - Choose the harder right instead of the easier wrong.

Bhai Chiller there was an old fauji in neighbourhood. He would say

Fauj mein mauj hai, free ration roz hai.
Jinda raho tension, mar jao pension !

raj2rif
June 30th, 2006, 11:25 PM
Tewathiaji, Thanks for the patient replies.
I guess gone are the days of - Choose the harder right instead of the easier wrong.

Bhai Chiller there was an old fauji in neighbourhood. He would say

Fauj mein mauj hai, free ration roz hai.
Jinda raho tension, mar jao pension !

Dear Sampuran Singh Ji,

Thanks a lot.

A good Joke. Add to it.

Fauj Mein

Hukam Todo mat
Phali Phodo mat
Aur Khana Chodo mat.

ratheetheraist
July 2nd, 2006, 03:36 PM
dear all and chillar bhai saab....

yahan mere ghar ke paas hi sec-12 main ek young officer ki death hui hai.....

army officials r saing tht it was a case of suicide and the family and many other sources r sain it was a murder........

now the issue was taken over by AAJ TAK..... and they told the whole story in KAATIL KON ..........

it goes like this........ one big oficer in army heired some labourers to dug a tunnel frm a remote area in kashmir... and the condition was tht they shall have beard.... then they took 5 of thm along with thm and after some time a news of gunning down of 5 militants came to surface nd tht officer was left to get his bravery due..........

bt this whole episode was known to this young captain and he was very honest nd true officer and said tht i will disclose this ..... and then he was killed through a big SAAJISH by that senior of his.....

the morality of officers and the way to touch the glory has changed and its ruining the image of army and the nation.....there r many alike cases.....

chhillar
November 1st, 2006, 06:38 AM
http://epaper.hindustantimes.com/Web/Article/2006/11/01/010/01_11_2006_010_005.jpg

chhillar
November 4th, 2006, 04:57 AM
Army moves to shoot down stress in soldiers
Vijay Mohan
Tribune News Service
Chandigarh, November 3
Faced with the increasing incidents of stressed-out soldiers committing suicide or turning their weapons on their own officers and fellow soldiers, the Army has drawn up plans to reorganise the Rashtriya Rifles (RR), its counter-insurgency force deployed in Jammu and Kashmir.
A study undertaken over the past few months has listed a series of measures aimed to cut stress levels and improve man-management in units deployed in anti-terrorist operations, sources in the Army Headquarters (AHQ) said. Intake into the RR, composition of units and service conditions are among the issues discussed.
The study commissioned by the Chief of the Army Staff, Gen J.J. Singh, submitted its findings and recommendations to the AHQ in October, sources revealed.
The study will be circulated to the top brass in the AHQ and later be disseminated to Army Commands for their comments, they added. It is expected to feature prominently in the next biannual Army Commanders’ Conference before the recommendations are cleared for implementation.
The study, according to sources, incorporated inputs from the Directorate-General RR, Adjutant-General’s Branch, including the Discipline and Vigilance Directorate, Military Secretary’s Branch, the Army Medical Corps as well as field formations deployed in anti-terrorist operations.
A significant recommendation by the study is to go in for more homogeneous battalions and units. At present, RR battalions comprise companies drawn not only from different infantry units but also from various arms and services. “The ethos, training and role of each arm is different,” an officer said. “Here we often have infantryman rubbing shoulders with gunners and engineers while deployed in a very stressful combat environment, which has a detrimental effect on the cohesiveness of a fighting force,” he added.
In fact after 1984, the Army had gone in for a “mixed-class” composition, where infantry units comprised companies from other infantry units. For example, a Punjab battalion would have a company from a Madras battalion, or a Maratha battalion would have a company of Sikh troops. This did not work well and in the nineties, the Army reverted them to their original “pure-class” composition.
On the posting of jawans, the study has recommended that personnel with “red-ink entries” are not to be sent to RR units. Red-ink entries in the service book are awarded for misconduct and five such entries entail dismissal from service. Further, if a trooper has been assessed by a psychiatric to be psychologically weak, or has been placed in low medical category, he is to be kept out of RR.
RR is to be the domain of experienced soldiers. Newcomers fresh out of training centres would not be sent to formations deployed in counter-insurgency duties or anti-terrorist operations. The study has also recommended against the use of personal mobile phones by troops and instead suggested that unit STD phones be used for keeping in touch with their families. “Disturbing news at odd hours or when on duty can trigger emotions,” an officer said.
Increase of leave from three months to four months as well as enhancement of certain allowances and perks has been recommended. It is also being considered that as a rule, those who have served in CI operations be given good peace-time postings.
Stress has also been laid on strengthening the buddy system, where soldiers can share emotions and feelings with someone they can trust. This also provides a channel of feedback to commanders if something amiss is noted in behaviour. Other recommendations put forth in the study include improving man-management by officers, introduction of yoga to combat stress and regular counselling.