wow...sub groups...gud... v r JATs

[shashiverma]

Recently I was looking at the newly added group section in JL. And i was disappointed to see groups based on the places you belong to or on gotras. So instead of just being Jat we will have further classifications based on the places/gotra..like rohtak jats, merrut jats.....nd..further. I will not be surprised if there is going to be seperate disscussions among these group insted of a common plateform and then some new yahoo or google group page after all we belong to same place..so we should share a stong bond....why to get lost in name of big community called jat....
I used to think that people make small groups so that they all can come together to make a bigger group at later stage....But this seem to be a reverse trend.....we will divide this bigger group into further small groups......why not after all we are jats....so no harm :D

Classifications based on the work is sometimes justified as all may not be interested and it may help people to grow. Although i would still say its better to share it on a broader plateform as it help others to increase their knowledge...

Anyways, this was just my personal opinion and concern.....so thought of bringing forward....

[shwetadhaka]

Recently I was looking at the newly added group section in JL. And i was disappointed to see groups based on the places you belong to or on gotras. So instead of just being Jat we will have further classifications based on the places/gotra..like rohtak jats, merrut jats.....nd..further. I will not be surprised if there is going to be seperate disscussions among these group insted of a common plateform and then some new yahoo or google group page after all we belong to same place..so we should share a stong bond....why to get lost in name of big community called jat....
I used to think that people make small groups so that they all can come together to make a bigger group at later stage....But this seem to be a reverse trend.....we will divide this bigger group into further small groups......why not after all we are jats....so no harm :D

Classifications based on the work is sometimes justified as all may not be interested and it may help people to grow. Although i would still say its better to share it on a broader plateform as it help others to increase their knowledge...

Anyways, this was just my personal opinion and concern.....so thought of bringing forward....
Yeah Di I agree ! If it happens then also it leads us nowhere.

[mkm_jat]

Ram Ram Shashiji n All

I agree with your points that there is no point in creating such groups, on the other hand having groups like Jats@Abroad or US or any other city within india can help the Jat Bros by bringing them close who all leaving far away their home.

But I think if we start discussion within the groups that will be really bad.

My views are personal, sorry if you feel them biased or wrong.

Regards
Manoj

[ravinderdahiya]

Recently I was looking at the newly added group section in JL. And i was disappointed to see groups based on the places you belong to or on gotras. So instead of just being Jat we will have further classifications based on the places/gotra..like rohtak jats, merrut jats.....nd..further. I will not be surprised if there is going to be seperate disscussions among these group insted of a common plateform and then some new yahoo or google group page after all we belong to same place..so we should share a stong bond....why to get lost in name of big community called jat....
I used to think that people make small groups so that they all can come together to make a bigger group at later stage....But this seem to be a reverse trend.....we will divide this bigger group into further small groups......why not after all we are jats....so no harm :D

Classifications based on the work is sometimes justified as all may not be interested and it may help people to grow. Although i would still say its better to share it on a broader plateform as it help others to increase their knowledge...

Anyways, this was just my personal opinion and concern.....so thought of bringing forward....

Ek dum sahi Sashi ji, I am sure that we do not need any further divide among Jats.
Rather we should try for unification as I feel we already have got enough divide as haryanvi Jat, UP ka Jat etc. etc.(which should not be there)

arr bhai kaha bhi gaya hai " Anpad Jat Padha barabar, aur padhya Jat khuda barabar"

arr Khuda(bhagwan) toh har jagah ek hi jaisa hota hai.

[ygulia]

I agree with Shashi.

[ritu]

very rt shashi .and frankly telling you it seems its more over here not in real life.quote=shashiverma;169232]Recently I was looking at the newly added group section in JL. And i was disappointed to see groups based on the places you belong to or on gotras. So instead of just being Jat we will have further classifications based on the places/gotra..like rohtak jats, merrut jats.....nd..further. I will not be surprised if there is going to be seperate disscussions among these group insted of a common plateform and then some new yahoo or google group page after all we belong to same place..so we should share a stong bond....why to get lost in name of big community called jat....
I used to think that people make small groups so that they all can come together to make a bigger group at later stage....But this seem to be a reverse trend.....we will divide this bigger group into further small groups......why not after all we are jats....so no harm :D

Classifications based on the work is sometimes justified as all may not be interested and it may help people to grow. Although i would still say its better to share it on a broader plateform as it help others to increase their knowledge...

Anyways, this was just my personal opinion and concern.....so thought of bringing forward....[/quote]

[vijay]

Personally i don't think that it's that bad ...... as it shows that what someone is upto and what's their mental level ........... hehehe ........... i like to analyze people.

I don't like the 'psudo forum face' of the people but really appreciate the genuine personalities who are here for some reasons only but not for their existance.

I wanted to bring out this fact ( once i mentioned it in chaupal too .... ) but restricted myself to do that as i know how people react on these issues ........

Shashi, Nice point raised as u did previously ( I hope you know which one ....... )