Results 1 to 20 of 22

Thread: Meaning of the word Hindu ( Black, Thief, Slave?)

Threaded View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1

    Meaning of the word Hindu ( Black, Thief, Slave?)

    It is an interesting article to share which go deeper in to the history of the word Hindu. It is by Baldev Singh, PhD
    316 R Glad way, Collegeville, PA 19426, USA.

    ---------------------------------------------------

    Hindu media has no qualms about publishing misinformation bout non-
    Hindus, but when confronted with a rebuttal, the editors look the
    other way and ignore it. Thus, I was not surprised when Prashant
    Shah published only a small portion of my response in India Tribune
    of Novenmber 2, 2002, to Niranjan Shah’s column “Letter from
    grandpa” with headline “Who is a Hindu? Who is not?” – that was
    published in India Tribune of September 28, 2002. Due to many
    centuries of subjugation and humiliation by foreigners, Hindus have
    lost self-respect, dignity and the will to face the truth and
    reality. Instead, they have become masters of deception,
    manipulation and hypocrisy. They cry hoarse, that foreign writers
    have maligned their religion and culture and distorted their
    history. However, they don’t have any compunction against quoting
    foreign historians if it suites their purpose as Niranjan Shah has
    done in his baseless and illogical rejoinder. Here is my reply to
    his rejoinder:-


    Shah has quoted several foreign sources to prove that “Hindu” is a
    corrupted version of “Sindhu.” However, he has ignored my questions
    and failed to reflect on the meaning of “Hindu Kush.” The
    interpretation that the word Hindu is a corrupted version of Sindhu
    does not explain why the Sindhu River or the people who live in the
    valley of this river did not acquire the name “Hindu.” This river is
    called Sindh and the people are called Punjabis and Sindhis. No body
    calls the state of Sindh as Hind or Sindhis as Hindis.

    I am not sure whether it was a Hindu or a European, who was the
    first to suggest that Persians called river Sindhu as Hindu due to
    difference in pronunciation. Nonetheless, this explanation has found
    its way in European writings. Hindus find comfort in this absurd
    explanation as it provides them escape from facing the reality of
    their humiliating past and connects them to their mythical glorious
    past, the so called Vedic period of Ram Raj. Indian writers who have
    looked at the meaning of “Hindu” with a critical eye don’t agree
    with the interpretation of foreign writers. For example:

    “The political situation of our country from centuries past, say 20-
    25 centuries has made it very difficult to understand the nature of
    this nation and its religion. The western scholars, and historians,
    too, have failed to trace the true name of this Brahmanland, a vast
    continent like country, and therefore, they have contended
    themselves by calling it by that meaningless term “Hindu.
    ” This
    word, which is a foreign innovation, is not made use by any of our
    Sanskrit writers and revered Acharyas in their works. It seems that
    political power was responsible for insisting upon continuous use of
    the word Hindu. The word Hindu is found, of course, in Persian
    literature. Hindu-e-falak means “the black of the sky’ and Saturn.”
    In the Arabic language Hind not Hindu means nation. It is shameful
    and ridiculous to have read all along in history that the name Hindu
    was given by the Persians to the people of our country when they
    landed on the sacred soil of Sindhu.”
    [R. N. Suryanarayan, Universal
    Religion, p 1-2, published from Mysore in 1952.]

    “Some people, according to the author, say that this word Hindu is a
    corrupt form of Sindhu but this is wrong because Sindhu was the name
    of the river and not the name of the community. Moreover, it is
    correct that this name has been given to the original Aryan race of
    the region by Muslim invaders to humiliate them. In Persian, says
    our author, the word means slave, and according to Islam, all those
    who did not embrace Islam were termed as slaves.” [Maharishi Shri
    Dayanand Sarswati Aur Unka Kaam, edited by Lala Lajpat Rai,
    published from Lahore in 1898, in the chapter of introduction.]

    Besides, a Persian dictionary titled Lughet-e-Kishwari, published in
    Lucknow in 1964, gives the meaning of Hindu as ‘chore (thief), dakoo
    (dacoit), raahzan (waylayer), and ghulam (slave)
    ’. Yet according to
    an other dictionary named Urdu-Feroze-ul-Laghat – part 1 (p 615),
    the meaning of the word Hindu is as under: In Turkish: chore,
    raahzan and lutera (looter). In Persian: ghulam (slave), barda
    (obedient servant), sia faam (black color) and kaalaa (black). The
    hypothesis that Persians had difficulty in pronouncing Sindhu is
    baseless and preposterous.
    For example, how do the Persians who are
    Shia Muslims pronounce words like Shia, Sunni and Shariat? In
    Punjabi there are many, many words of Persian origin, which start
    with “s” and “sh.” For example, sardar or sirdar (leader), shaheed
    (martyr), shhadat (martyrdom) shair (lion), sahir (town), sar (walk)
    shayer (poet), shakar (sugar), sja (punishment), siahi (black ink),
    siah(black) and so on. The word Punjab is also derived from Persian
    panch and aab (five waters).

    The word Hindu may be as old as the Indus Vallay Civilization. To
    find the meaning of “Hindu” one ought to look at the term “Hindu
    Kush”(killer of Hindus). Who were the people, who named this
    mountain range as Hindu Kush? Why these mountains were called the
    killers of Hindus? As I mentioned earlier, the Indian subcontinent
    was inhabited by dark complexioned people before the migration of
    Caucasian tribes from the Caucasus region. The fair skinned
    Caucasian tribes who lived on the Northwest of Hindu Kush Moutain
    range called the Indian subcontinent as the land of Hindus (land of
    black people). The Northwest expansion of the inhabitants of Indus
    Valley was prevented by of Hindu Kush Mountains. Whenever the plain
    dwelling Indians (Hindus) attempted to cross these mountains, they
    met death due harsh terrain and heavy snow. That is how these
    mountains were given the name Hindu Kush by mountain dwelling
    Caucasian tribes. Once a large number of Indian people died on these
    mountains due to heavy snow fall and that is how these mountains
    acquired the name “Hindu Kush” – killer of the Hindus. [Bhai Kahan
    Singh Nabha, Mahan Kosh, 1996 edn. p 275.]

    Later on when the Caucasian tribes conquered Northwest India, they
    continued using the name Hindu for native Indians. To humiliate the
    natives, the Caucasians ridiculed their culture, looks and black
    complexion, and used derogatory expressions for them. It is
    astonishing that these derogatory expressions have survived through
    thousands of years of Indian history and are found in modern Indian
    languages. “Blackness” is used in bad connotation in Indian
    languages. For example, in Punjabi there are expressions like, kaala
    munh (black mouth, ugly or who speaks ill), kaali Jeebh ( evil
    speaking tounge), kaala chore (notorious thief), kaala dhandha
    (illegal profession), kaala dhan (black money), kaali bhaid (black
    sheep), kalai laikh (black deeds) and kaala chum (black skinned
    person). There are also expressions like bandar munhan (monkey face)
    and rish jeha (bear-like), which the Caucasians used to describe the
    features of native Indians (Hindus). In Ramyan, the two native
    devotees of Shri Ram Chandar are depicted as a monkey (Hanuman) and
    a bear (Jamawant).

    .................................................. .Contd............................................ ...........
    Last edited by Samarkadian; April 20th, 2012 at 02:56 PM.
    "All I am trying to do is bridge the gap between Jats and Rest of World"

    As I shall imagine, so shall I become.

  2. The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to Samarkadian For This Useful Post:

    JSRana (April 25th, 2012), pankajpotaliya (May 5th, 2014), Prikshit (April 24th, 2012), rajpaldular (July 12th, 2013), ravinderjeet (April 21st, 2012), satyenderdeswal (April 20th, 2012), Sure (April 24th, 2012)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •