PDA

View Full Version : Indian Circus: Self-Destruction At Its Best



nmalik121
April 23rd, 2007, 05:00 PM
http://img149.imageshack.us/img149/3960/crosskq7.gif

It is an irony in India that true achievers are here only used for mourning purpose. Though this country lacks any real ideal for its youth, yet whatever talent India possesses in any form or stream, it is rejected with utmost rudeness. The government, media, and the society always try to use the talent according to their own suitability. Media strives hard to create the stars out of none and afterwards tear it apart and this process continues forever. People also take part in this circus blissfully. And after their death, they are called achievers, ahead of time, heaped upon several awards recognized at national level. How sad!

Here, the problem lies with the fact that this huge Indian talent is being ignored in India and recognized at international level. It says a lot about our failure of judgment and sheer apathy towards natural talent. We always let it slip from our hands and then sulk that people prefer foreign to India.

And those who stick to India (out of choice or compulsion), we humiliate them at the drop of a hat. And the funny thing is that we quickly change sides too. Take the recent example of Sourave Ganguly, ex-caption of Indian Cricket team. First he was thrown out of team on the basis that he is not performing, though the team was on a winning streak. The whole country was after him for not scoring runs. He was not only stripped of his captaincy, but literally thrown out of Indian team with utmost insult. That very moment he was turned into an underdog. Same media and people now wanted him to succeed and come back. Now, our Indian team is broken, down and completely out. What was the need to fix something that is not broken? I hope that these bad days will pass soon and Indian Cricket team will be back to its old winning days however I question the sheer negative attitude of media, and my countrymen.

Take an example of few talented people in their own filed, who has achieved great heights just on the basis of their sheer hard work and strong will power, without any false support such as Pandit Ravi Shankar, Narayan Murthi, Mohammad Rafi, PremChand, Milkha Singh, Mohan Lal, Shiv Kumar Batalavi, PJ Abdul kalam, Laxmi Mittal, Balraj Sahni, Gurudutt, Naushad, javed Akhtar, Amitabh Bachhan, ShahRukh Khan, Sachin Tendulkar, R. V. Raman and many more.

Shailendra Verma, a 12 –years old guy from U. P., is the youngest student enrolled in the Bachelor of Computer Application course in Lucknow University. He has passed the TOEFL and SAT with flying colors. He applied for admission in a Bachelor of Computer Science course at the Eastern New Mexico University in the US and even got through without much effort. But Shailendra could not make it to the US because his father, Tej Bahadur Verma, is a daily wage labourer who earns Rs 70 per day. The family could not afford his train fare to Delhi; leave alone the flight to the US. This highly intelligent guy aspires to be a software engineer though he doesn’t have any computer to learn. My heart bleeds to see this sheer waste of talent. Both central and state governments has no answer.

All the above-mentioned people came from middle class environment and achieved the greater heights of success in their respective fields. Just few months back, the French government has bestowed the award of Officier de la Legion (Officer of the Legion of Honour) on Amitabh Bachchan. The award is a recognition of Mr Bachchan’s contribution to Indian and international cultural life. But in India, the legend actor is harassed by IT people and ruling party. That’s the way our most of achievers are treated around the whole country.

The prestigious MIT Technology Review this year features as many as nine Indians in its list of top 100 innovators, all of them under 35. They include Srinidhi Varadarajan, who conceived and built the world's third fastest supercomputer earlier this year.

Chaitali Sengupta, a systems architect at Texas Instruments, has been recognized for her work on communications chips used in advanced cellular systems now coming to market. These chips let multimedia cell phones more easily handle Internet access, videoconferencing and mobile commerce.

Smruti Vidwans, a postdoctoral fellow at University of California, for developing a new approach to develop anti-TB drugs.

Vikram Sheel Kumar, cofounder and CEO of Dimagi in Boston, who has developed interactive software that motivates patients to manage chronic diseases such as diabetes and AIDS.

Ananth Natarajan, CEO of Infinite Biomedical Technologies in Baltimore, Maryland, for developing a technology that will enable implantable cardiac devices to detect incipient heart attacks.

Ramesh Raskar, a research scientist at Mitsubishi Electric, for building large computer display systems that seamlessly combine images from multiple projectors and for image-processing and graphics research that may lead to new applications in entertainment and image-guided surgery.

Mayank Bulsara, co-founder and chief technology officer of AmberWave Systems, for developing strained silicon that makes computer chips run faster and consume less power.

Ravi Kane, an assistant professor at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, for developing a highly potent anthrax treatment.

It is important to understand how the Successful Achievers can help in contributing the intellectual growth, social & economic betterment, unity among the society engaged in various streams of life, and infrastructural development in and around the country. They should be encouraged to come forward on a common stage and help in finding the talent on grass root level and hone the skills of the gifted people.

Success is a true success only when it helps others becomes successful too.

yatinder19
April 23rd, 2007, 05:52 PM
This is role of media and its playing it everywhere in the world...Sometimes its correct,sometimes its wrong...They make stars from no where but if they are not performing they make them Zero...

narendra81
April 23rd, 2007, 06:23 PM
media in india is still in itz childhood days and enjoying the freedom of speech and the technology which is helping it in doing wht it wants...
now, at this immature stage, they are not able to judge weither they are doing right or wrong because in one way or other, they are getting appriciation from we people...
what I think is that media will learn gradually with time and lessons learnt in that time...
the day will definatly cm when media and common ppl will cm to know the conciquences of their tasks done in the past...
And i am quite sure that the changes after that will be more stable and much more in faviour of the society....
media's current perspective will change when it comes to a saturation level and then we will feel the diffrence....
Big issues like this always take time....

anyway...thanx a lot nitin for coming forword with this isssue..

regards,
narendra

nmalik121
April 23rd, 2007, 08:51 PM
You are welcome, Narendra! And Thanks to both you and Yatinder for expressing your views on my post. But one thing i found common as well as strange in both of comments that only media's role has been scrutnized while the oter culprits: government and people (WE) have been spared at large. A bit unfare to media. After all media serves only what people want to read! is it no true friends?

narendra81
April 24th, 2007, 10:08 AM
hi nitin,
You are right that the government and ppl are also equally responsible for all this. Let us discuss abt the ppl first.
Itz correct that media serve only wht we want to recieve. Now y ppl like these things?? the reason is again that this sort of varsatility in the media is new to this country (It includes all kind of stuff) and itz is still a testing phase for most of ppl.
See it is human nature that at first we will check everything and then only decide where to stick.
Let me elaborate with an example.
when a person is introduced to internet, he will try to explore all the areas like chat, music, movie, news, forums,blogs,may be porn stuff also, and lot many things.
But after sometime, he will go for only those things which he really like and which are relevent to him.
I mean to say, selection starts only after testing all of them.

Same is applicable to TV also.

Right now the TV channals are almost in testing phase counting most of the ppl so we are OK with any kind of stuff served (take it in general scenario).
Gradually, ppl will decide their priorities and that will be recieved by the media immediately as an input and then we will see the diffrence in the stuff they serve.
i hope I have'nt confused u.

Now again the role of government..
governtment right now is behaving again the way common ppl is.
Same testing phase is going on there. This is really a problem of concern because we cant leave everything on time. Somewhere we need to put expert steps in this case. I would say, the governing body should be consisting of the experts in that department.

Imagine the case if information and broadcasting minister is an experienced jurnalist or some media personal with good credentials with him/her. He can decide better than any other citizen. Here we are really lacking. I have felt this problem in almost all ministries.

So the matter of concern is the government here and I m sure, a lot can be changed here if we can somehow overcome of this problem at least. otherwise, the change in thinking of common man is going to take time and itz really a gradual process.

regards,
narendra

nmalik121
April 24th, 2007, 02:25 PM
Well Said Buddy...........I am Impressed....I hope to get such preciosu inputs/commenst from you to my post! Thanks a lot!