Corrupted Indian Media

[fundcom]

What is paraded as journalism by capturing airwaves/print by the likes of Tehelka, NDTV Prannoy Roy, India Today Aroon Poories, CNN Rajdeep Sardesai, N. Ram of Hindu and others has little to do with journalism. The same people tirading against Narendra Modi will crawl in front of Sonia like dogs wagging their tails. What is the real interest of these people? Do they want to contribute to growth of India or they want to divide on communal basis. All Gujartis irresepective of their religion are benefitting from the progress of the state and don't we want to put that as model for growth and emulate in all parts of the country?



In a democracy, no one should be held sacrosanct and it is the duty of journalism to expose the culprits from any section. But what if the journalists themselves culprits with an agenda of their own. They put a label and dismiss the message that goes against their agenda.



If the real interest of the media is exposing the culprits, why did they also not go after Sonia with all the corruption and division of country which threatens the security and unity of the country? Why do they not go after the Sikh Riots where 3000 sikhs burnt alive, before the Punjab elections? How about the mysterious deaths of Rajesh Pilot, Madhav Rao Scindia etc at the same time Sonia rose in congress? What about the carnage victims in the train in Godhra? Why do they not go after Rahul being anointed as next PM with little regards to ability or eligibility? Why are they not going after government that has done little to curb terrorism? What have they done about Kashmir terrorism? Can they make a video of the terrorists in Kashmir and show it?



Are Muslims innocent? A friend of mine told us a story how in Hyderabad his uncle who owed money to a Muslim moneylender, his aunt and two daughters were taken away for non-payment in time and they never saw them. This was in 1977 and somone did see the aunt after several years with purdah and she told the daughters are sold and was afraid to even talk for more than few minutes.



Can anyone of these Journalists define what secularism is? Is secularism the destruction of one section to the advantage of another. How dare NDTV runs a show on questioning the faith in Sabarimala flame? Will they do same thing about Christ coming alive after being crucified or about Virgin birth? Will the same people dare to talk about the treatment of women in Islam? Did they have guts to talk when Taslima was threatened to be beheaded by fundamentalists. Mr. N. Ram who says Danish Cartoons are wrong declares that Hussain paintings of nude Hindu gods or goddesses are artistic expressions? Did he question why Hussain never painted Muhammad or his (Muhammad's) daughter the same way? Does he has anything to say about rampant illegal conversions going on in the country.



The same journalists compare India with America. How many terrorist events happened since 2001 in US whereas Indian Govt in pursuit of vote bank politics resulted in the maximum number of terrorist victims since the current Government came into power. In spite of so much slavery which killed 50 million African Americans (which church justified that they do not have souls), they are removing any affirmative action policies whereas India purusing division of country for power and dynasty. While Bobby Jindal conversion to Christianity helped him get elected, Sonia Gandhi voted with many who are Hindus, disdains Hinduism, declares their sacred God is mythological and reduces the number of Hindu holidays in a country with 70% Hindus to same or even less than the the other sections. Holi or even Rama Navami are removed from Government holiday lists. What does the Indian media have to say about this?



Can anyone of these journalists survive even for one day in any islamic country if they talk even a fraction of about Islam the way they talk about Hinduism in India? What do these people want? Convert the whole country into Islam and Christian and wipe out Hinduism? Or convert Hindus into second class citizens? Is this what Mahatma Gandhi dreamed of when he went out of his way to protect minorities? Did these people read history of India for last 700 years without prejudice?



The list can go on... and it only says these dogs have little self respect and they are simply sold. They are untouchable criminals of the Indian society. If you pay them or threaten them enough, they will do anyone's bidding. It is sacred duty of evey sensible citizen to eliminate these type of journalism in whatever means possible. Perhaps it is time to issue fatwas at these people.

Surinder Singh

[VPannu]

Seema, aayiyo ek be. bulaave hai koye aapne:p

[rohittewatia]

What is paraded as journalism by capturing airwaves/print by the likes of Tehelka, NDTV Prannoy Roy, India Today Aroon Poories, CNN Rajdeep Sardesai, N. Ram of Hindu and others has little to do with journalism. The same people tirading against Narendra Modi will crawl in front of Sonia like dogs wagging their tails. What is the real interest of these people? Do they want to contribute to growth of India or they want to divide on communal basis. All Gujartis irresepective of their religion are benefitting from the progress of the state and don't we want to put that as model for growth and emulate in all parts of the country?



In a democracy, no one should be held sacrosanct and it is the duty of journalism to expose the culprits from any section. But what if the journalists themselves culprits with an agenda of their own. They put a label and dismiss the message that goes against their agenda.



If the real interest of the media is exposing the culprits, why did they also not go after Sonia with all the corruption and division of country which threatens the security and unity of the country? Why do they not go after the Sikh Riots where 3000 sikhs burnt alive, before the Punjab elections? How about the mysterious deaths of Rajesh Pilot, Madhav Rao Scindia etc at the same time Sonia rose in congress? What about the carnage victims in the train in Godhra? Why do they not go after Rahul being anointed as next PM with little regards to ability or eligibility? Why are they not going after government that has done little to curb terrorism? What have they done about Kashmir terrorism? Can they make a video of the terrorists in Kashmir and show it?



Are Muslims innocent? A friend of mine told us a story how in Hyderabad his uncle who owed money to a Muslim moneylender, his aunt and two daughters were taken away for non-payment in time and they never saw them. This was in 1977 and somone did see the aunt after several years with purdah and she told the daughters are sold and was afraid to even talk for more than few minutes.



Can anyone of these Journalists define what secularism is? Is secularism the destruction of one section to the advantage of another. How dare NDTV runs a show on questioning the faith in Sabarimala flame? Will they do same thing about Christ coming alive after being crucified or about Virgin birth? Will the same people dare to talk about the treatment of women in Islam? Did they have guts to talk when Taslima was threatened to be beheaded by fundamentalists. Mr. N. Ram who says Danish Cartoons are wrong declares that Hussain paintings of nude Hindu gods or goddesses are artistic expressions? Did he question why Hussain never painted Muhammad or his (Muhammad's) daughter the same way? Does he has anything to say about rampant illegal conversions going on in the country.



The same journalists compare India with America. How many terrorist events happened since 2001 in US whereas Indian Govt in pursuit of vote bank politics resulted in the maximum number of terrorist victims since the current Government came into power. In spite of so much slavery which killed 50 million African Americans (which church justified that they do not have souls), they are removing any affirmative action policies whereas India purusing division of country for power and dynasty. While Bobby Jindal conversion to Christianity helped him get elected, Sonia Gandhi voted with many who are Hindus, disdains Hinduism, declares their sacred God is mythological and reduces the number of Hindu holidays in a country with 70% Hindus to same or even less than the the other sections. Holi or even Rama Navami are removed from Government holiday lists. What does the Indian media have to say about this?



Can anyone of these journalists survive even for one day in any islamic country if they talk even a fraction of about Islam the way they talk about Hinduism in India? What do these people want? Convert the whole country into Islam and Christian and wipe out Hinduism? Or convert Hindus into second class citizens? Is this what Mahatma Gandhi dreamed of when he went out of his way to protect minorities? Did these people read history of India for last 700 years without prejudice?



The list can go on... and it only says these dogs have little self respect and they are simply sold. They are untouchable criminals of the Indian society. If you pay them or threaten them enough, they will do anyone's bidding. It is sacred duty of evey sensible citizen to eliminate these type of journalism in whatever means possible. Perhaps it is time to issue fatwas at these people.

Surinder Singh

Rightly pointed out...Just to show the whole world that we are not partial to the majority...we do not need to ignore the faults of minorities and punish only the majority...rather give it a fair share of what it deserves.

Everything is politically motivated...everything has an angle attached...interests preserved...Unfortunately, tht's how things work here...It would take more than a decade or even couple of decades for things to change...Hindu seemed like a impartial view of things...not anymore...

[sidchhikara]

The liberal press in India is biased in favor of the minorities. Lot of Indian liberals are also hypocrites. The religious right is also a bunch of hypocrites.

Here is an excellent writeup... from.. http://indiauncut.com/iublog/article/why-indian-liberals-arent-quite-liberal/

Why Indian ‘liberals’ aren’t quite liberal

Vir Sanghvi makes an immensely valid point here (http://www.hindustantimes.com/StoryPage/StoryPage.aspx?id=ebce8724-1e20-44f8-9e29-9a0f03fa3881&MatchID1=4464&TeamID1=10&TeamID2=6&MatchType1=1&SeriesID1=1109&MatchID2=4466&TeamID3=2&TeamID4=4&MatchType2=1&SeriesID2=1110&PrimaryID=4464&Headline=Art%2c+tolerance+and+religion):

Every liberal I know argued that MF Husain had the right to paint a naked Saraswati or a nude Bharat Mata. Yet, hardly any liberal of my acquaintance extended the same principle to the Danish cartoons. The liberal position was that Hindus should be tolerant of the manner in which their gods and goddesses were portrayed but that Muslims were right to complain about any visual representation of the Prophet Mohammed.
By ‘liberal’, of course, he is referring to the Leftists who have appropriated that term (both in India and the US), and are hardly liberal in the classical sense (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Classical_liberalism). So while liberalism is all about individual freedoms, many Indian ‘liberals’ are actually against economic freedom, and their support for social freedoms depends on convenience. As Sanghvi points out, many of them have double standards, speaking out for free speech on issues where the BJP is involved, but being silent when people of other religions act in an equally repugnant manner. As I wrote here (http://indiauncut.com/iublog/article/only-live-in-fear/), such ad-hoc support does nothing for the cause.
(Readers of this blog would know that I invite abuse from intolerant people everywhere by speaking up against violations of free speech regardless of the religion of the violators: one of the most-read posts on this blog is the one speaking up for the Danish cartoonists (http://indiauncut.blogspot.com/2006/02/do-not-draw-my-unicorn.html), and I’ve expressed myself on the subject adequately in ”Don’t Insult Pasta (http://indiauncut.com/iublog/article/dont-insult-pasta/)” and ”Fighting Against Censorship (http://indiauncut.com/iublog/article/fighting-against-censorship-in-india/)”.)
What gets my youthful goat, however, is when Hindutva supporters use the hypocrisy of some of the protesters against the Baroda incidents to distract from the larger issue of oppression and free speech. Focussing on people instead of issues is a typical diversionary tactic, and I think they would be much better off simply stating, “We do not believe in free speech. We believe our religious sentiments are more important than your individual freedoms. So there.” That would at least be an honest position, and would address the issues involved. But public discourse in India focusses more on personality than on issues, ignoring arguments while attacking the people making them. Pity.
(My posts on the Baroda incidents: ”Fascism in Baroda (http://indiauncut.com/iublog/article/fascism-in-baroda/).” ”Only live in fear (http://indiauncut.com/iublog/article/only-live-in-fear/).” ”The Hindutva Rashtra (http://indiauncut.com/iublog/article/the-hindutva-rashtra/).")

[fundcom]

It was never this bad.

Narsimha Rao was there and it was OK. She is leaving everybody behind and this CNN is doing the same thing in India what they do in USA. I do not remember a day when this CNN do not cry. 24/7 they complain about rest of the world and speciallly China and India. Fox is another one, which is Star in india (Same owner).

Mwdia is godless these days. Our way of living is such that nobody teaches us hatred.

My goal was just to create awareness . How many of you knwo that Anbumani Ramadoss, Ajit Jogi were christian. There are more which I do not remember. Most of the leaders have Hindu name but they are catholic.

She is appointing quite a few people on the higher post these days who hails from Catholic background.

You can read about "Project Joshua". They are pumping in huge amount of money into India for conversion, buying major lands in Mumbai, buying major timeslots on TV channels etc. Foreigh channels are suppoint this cause.

We should be aware of all this.
SS.

[ssindhu]

What is paraded as journalism by capturing airwaves/print by the likes of Tehelka, NDTV Prannoy Roy, India Today Aroon Poories, CNN Rajdeep Sardesai, N. Ram of Hindu and others has little to do with journalism. The same people tirading against Narendra Modi will crawl in front of Sonia like dogs wagging their tails. What is the real interest of these people? Do they want to contribute to growth of India or they want to divide on communal basis. All Gujartis irresepective of their religion are benefitting from the progress of the state and don't we want to put that as model for growth and emulate in all parts of the country?



In a democracy, no one should be held sacrosanct and it is the duty of journalism to expose the culprits from any section. But what if the journalists themselves culprits with an agenda of their own. They put a label and dismiss the message that goes against their agenda.



If the real interest of the media is exposing the culprits, why did they also not go after Sonia with all the corruption and division of country which threatens the security and unity of the country? Why do they not go after the Sikh Riots where 3000 sikhs burnt alive, before the Punjab elections? How about the mysterious deaths of Rajesh Pilot, Madhav Rao Scindia etc at the same time Sonia rose in congress? What about the carnage victims in the train in Godhra? Why do they not go after Rahul being anointed as next PM with little regards to ability or eligibility? Why are they not going after government that has done little to curb terrorism? What have they done about Kashmir terrorism? Can they make a video of the terrorists in Kashmir and show it?



Are Muslims innocent? A friend of mine told us a story how in Hyderabad his uncle who owed money to a Muslim moneylender, his aunt and two daughters were taken away for non-payment in time and they never saw them. This was in 1977 and somone did see the aunt after several years with purdah and she told the daughters are sold and was afraid to even talk for more than few minutes.



Can anyone of these Journalists define what secularism is? Is secularism the destruction of one section to the advantage of another. How dare NDTV runs a show on questioning the faith in Sabarimala flame? Will they do same thing about Christ coming alive after being crucified or about Virgin birth? Will the same people dare to talk about the treatment of women in Islam? Did they have guts to talk when Taslima was threatened to be beheaded by fundamentalists. Mr. N. Ram who says Danish Cartoons are wrong declares that Hussain paintings of nude Hindu gods or goddesses are artistic expressions? Did he question why Hussain never painted Muhammad or his (Muhammad's) daughter the same way? Does he has anything to say about rampant illegal conversions going on in the country.



The same journalists compare India with America. How many terrorist events happened since 2001 in US whereas Indian Govt in pursuit of vote bank politics resulted in the maximum number of terrorist victims since the current Government came into power. In spite of so much slavery which killed 50 million African Americans (which church justified that they do not have souls), they are removing any affirmative action policies whereas India purusing division of country for power and dynasty. While Bobby Jindal conversion to Christianity helped him get elected, Sonia Gandhi voted with many who are Hindus, disdains Hinduism, declares their sacred God is mythological and reduces the number of Hindu holidays in a country with 70% Hindus to same or even less than the the other sections. Holi or even Rama Navami are removed from Government holiday lists. What does the Indian media have to say about this?



Can anyone of these journalists survive even for one day in any islamic country if they talk even a fraction of about Islam the way they talk about Hinduism in India? What do these people want? Convert the whole country into Islam and Christian and wipe out Hinduism? Or convert Hindus into second class citizens? Is this what Mahatma Gandhi dreamed of when he went out of his way to protect minorities? Did these people read history of India for last 700 years without prejudice?



The list can go on... and it only says these dogs have little self respect and they are simply sold. They are untouchable criminals of the Indian society. If you pay them or threaten them enough, they will do anyone's bidding. It is sacred duty of evey sensible citizen to eliminate these type of journalism in whatever means possible. Perhaps it is time to issue fatwas at these people.

Surinder Singh
too verbose is this post, i would try to suffice in least

how many people buy tehlka on a regular subscription? not many...it's bought only when they do some big sting...else its a favourite of politicians only...not public...everybody knows that tehlka is a mouthpiece of congress...

secondly, if people had read the aftermath articles after this godhra sting of tehlka...CNN had a debate on the contents of this and one debate on the timing of it as well...aren't they secular here?

vir sanghvi wrote an article in brunch in which he also doubted the timing of this sting...

as far as sikh riots and godhra rakings are concerned...sikh riots are too old to be talked during election times...but yet are you forgetting that in delhi legislative elections, TOI and HT both wrote against sajjan kumar's credibility, but yet he won...all public's fault...media did its job

wasn't boforse scam raked equally at par with arm deal bribe scam of jaswant and jaya done by tehlka?

CNN was the first channel to debate on troops cut in kashmir and the debate had a sharp castigation on congress' n azad's stand on it...farook abdullah was the chief panelist...

as far as conversion is concerned...again it were some prime newspapers like TOI and HT which dissected the issues...but such issues can't be talked daily...as it's an individual folly...so there was no exaggeration...

stop tomtomming against media blindly...

if people can't distinguish between good and bad, authentic and fabricated, that's their fault...not media's...nobody considers tehlka a good piece...you can't paint media black just because of poor discreet IQ of public...they bloody talk of sensational news...not media...

it seems people on JL are too fond of tehlka, india TV and aaj tak...

grow up...look at the intellectual stuff...not the corny

[mukeshkumar007]

too verbose is this post, i would try to suffice in least

how many people buy tehlka on a regular subscription? not many...it's bought only when they do some big sting...else its a favourite of politicians only...not public...everybody knows that tehlka is a mouthpiece of congress...

secondly, if people had read the aftermath articles after this godhra sting of tehlka...CNN had a debate on the contents of this and one debate on the timing of it as well...aren't they secular here?

vir sanghvi wrote an article in brunch in which he also doubted the timing of this sting...

as far as sikh riots and godhra rakings are concerned...sikh riots are too old to be talked during election times...but yet are you forgetting that in delhi legislative elections, TOI and HT both wrote against sajjan kumar's credibility, but yet he won...all public's fault...media did its job

wasn't boforse scam raked equally at par with arm deal bribe scam of jaswant and jaya done by tehlka?

CNN was the first channel to debate on troops cut in kashmir and the debate had a sharp castigation on congress' n azad's stand on it...farook abdullah was the chief panelist...

as far as conversion is concerned...again it were some prime newspapers like TOI and HT which dissected the issues...but such issues can't be talked daily...as it's an individual folly...so there was no exaggeration...

stop tomtomming against media blindly...

if people can't distinguish between good and bad, authentic and fabricated, that's their fault...not media's...nobody considers tehlka a good piece...you can't paint media black just because of poor discreet IQ of public...they bloody talk of sensational news...not media...

it seems people on JL are too fond of tehlka, india TV and aaj tak...

grow up...look at the intellectual stuff...not the corny

exactly !! you have rightly pointed out it. I was expecting the same kind of reply from you.

Eventhough like anyother pillar of democracy media is not able deliver justice with its full responsibility but still it serves the purpose upto some extent. Since it is no more a service it is a kind of business so its upto us how we perceive the things. we all are the stakeholder of this system so its our duity to ensure everything on the right track.

[ssindhu]

exactly !! you have rightly pointed out it. I was expecting the same kind of reply from you.

Eventhough like anyother pillar of democracy media is not able deliver justice with its full responsibility but still it serves the purpose upto some extent. Since it is no more a service it is a kind of business so its upto us how we perceive the things. we all are the stakeholder of this system so its our duity to ensure everything on the right track.
oh i didn't know that you know me so well. lollllllll

[fundcom]

Admitting mistakes and then continue to do it is a style of these politician to impress the junta. One very good example was Ram Setu that whole congress was pro-ram setu and when debate got heated up then two congress MPs argued which was a stunt.

Media shows what they want. Not what is going to happen. So if CNN shows any good thing then we have to analyse the cause behing it. They are clever and keep thing balanced.

only TIME will answer these question.
It has been true for the last 1000+ years because of our ignorance. We people sleep to a extent and all of sudden awake and revolution take place.

Media is very smart. Tehelka may be cheap but rest of them are doing things very nicely. The things they are doing nicely are never pointed out to people. It is like Bush says that he wants democracy in Iraq but actually it is oil. Who will know this fact is only those people who read news papers and educated. What about people leaving in villages, farmers etc. Not everybody has access to news. Our goal is to make them aware. If awareness is strong from the begening then nobody can buy us. Lot of people do not read news and do not have time to read news. So even if media shows right they never got the news (forget about the game plan behing the news). It is our responsibility to make them aware. Celever people are reaching to them before we even think about it. We should alway analyze the plan/offer. Facevalue may not be the true face.

I am not crying about media and not complaining the media and not tomtomming the media.

regards.

[ssindhu]

Admitting mistakes and then continue to do it is a style of these politician to impress the junta. One very good example was Ram Setu that whole congress was pro-ram setu and when debate got heated up then two congress MPs argued which was a stunt.

Media shows what they want. Not what is going to happen. So if CNN shows any good thing then we have to analyse the cause behing it. They are clever and keep thing balanced.

only TIME will answer these question.
It has been true for the last 1000+ years because of our ignorance. We people sleep to a extent and all of sudden awake and revolution take place.

Media is very smart. Tehelka may be cheap but rest of them are doing things very nicely. The things they are doing nicely are never pointed out to people. It is like Bush says that he wants democracy in Iraq but actually it is oil. Who will know this fact is only those people who read news papers and educated. What about people leaving in villages, farmers etc. Not everybody has access to news. Our goal is to make them aware. If awareness is strong from the begening then nobody can buy us. Lot of people do not read news and do not have time to read news. So even if media shows right they never got the news (forget about the game plan behing the news). It is our responsibility to make them aware. Celever people are reaching to them before we even think about it. We should alway analyze the plan/offer. Facevalue may not be the true face.

I am not crying about media and not complaining the media and not tomtomming the media.

regards.
hmm...good, you seem to be steering away from your previous post in this post now...

anyways prannoy's cahnnel NDTV had a debate 'for and against' anchored by nidhi raazdaan on gujrat elections yesterday...the channel you have accused of being biased...plz notice it was 'for' and 'against'

[jitendershooda]

hmm...good, you seem to be steering away from your previous post in this post now...

anyways prannoy's cahnnel NDTV had a debate 'for and against' anchored by nidhi raazdaan on gujrat elections yesterday...the channel you have accused of being biased...plz notice it was 'for' and 'against'

Acha tun nue bata ek kunsa news channel aacha hai (unbiased and perform good homework before publishing) er kunsa newspaper, taki sare pher wohe dekhen bina time kharab kare. Hindi er Angreji donu bataiye, unbiased ;)

[crsnadar]

Today is first phase of Voting for Gujrat Elections.
On so many channels there are lots of swanky advertisements prepared by Congress People & these look like it's only Congress who deserve to rule.
hahaha..!

It has been shown that there is Narendra Modi on one side & Sonia Gandhi on the other side.
What the hell is this. Is this a tussle between Congress President & CM of Gujrat. Do the Congress not have any Political Leader to stand against Modi.

As far Gujratis I have met, they told it was only Narendra Modi in the reign of whom there has been development in every corner of Gujrat.

Congress has only one card Godhra Card.....only Godhra.....

It is Indian Media & News Channels who are striving out so hard to make this card a triumph card. But probably would not get success.

70% to 80% of the sting operations are performed against BJP, in duo of BJP-Congress fight.

Everytime these operations come in light when the Election are there.

Sonia Gandhi is a lady & News Channels are sometime creating an aroma like it's a struggle between a daring lady & an autocratic CM.

Media people are nothing different. They also wanna hike their trp ratings & to show off that they can change/make any Goverment.

It's very sad to know this...as since few years back Media has played an important role in controlling buerocrats to misuse their power. Very nice is this.
But why at the time of elections it becomes completely biased.
Why Media Advertise some party as a Dudh ki Dhuli party & the other as Ghost.

Kuchh logo ne kaha ki aisa aisa hua godhra ke time.
News channels ko sochna chaahiye ki jin logon ke comments ke base par wo decision le rahe hain wo kya Bhagwan hain ya Suprem Court hain ya Raj Harishchandra Hain.
Aisa bhi to ho sakta hai ki wo Modi ki image damage karne ki koshish kar rahe ho.
Or if you are believing one people than why not other, on the basis of verbal statements.
Tehlka is having only statements said by few people in most of the operations.

[mukeshkumar007]

Kuchh logo ne kaha ki aisa aisa hua godhra ke time.
News channels ko sochna chaahiye ki jin logon ke comments ke base par wo decision le rahe hain wo kya Bhagwan hain ya Suprem Court hain ya Raj Harishchandra Hain.
Aisa bhi to ho sakta hai ki wo Modi ki image damage karne ki koshish kar rahe ho.
Or if you are believing one people than why not other, on the basis of verbal statement

hone ka to pata nai bhai kya kya ho sakta hai.. hone ko to suprem court bi galat ho sakta hai aur ho sakta hai ki Raja Harishchandra bi jhoot bolne lag gaya hoo !!

media apke samen ek issue ke different points rakh deta hai jinme se kuch kisi ke statement par based hoti hai to kuch experiene par based... ab yeh aap par nirbhar karta hai ki unme se truth kya hai us tak kaise pahochte hoo...itna to observe har koi kar sakta hai...

[crsnadar]

Yes bro,
But let's see in hope of some positive changes in INDIAN MEDIA

bye

[ssindhu]

Acha tun nue bata ek kunsa news channel aacha hai (unbiased and perform good homework before publishing) er kunsa newspaper, taki sare pher wohe dekhen bina time kharab kare. Hindi er Angreji donu bataiye, unbiased ;)
hindi ka te bera na...i find hindi channel's content quite repulsive...the have more local and funny coverage like murders, rapes, superstitions et al...

english i must say...times now have no patron in politics as such, NDTV and IBN are equally good...

today group is a puppet of congress though...

best ones: and believe me you can rely them are
business news channels like CNBC and profit, hindi you can rely on ZEE business

and best newspaper to read- Business Standard.

lol

kya bidu tum log bhi generic news ki baat karte ho...chuck it...business and economy is the future...wo dekho

ha ha

[ssindhu]

Today is first phase of Voting for Gujrat Elections.
On so many channels there are lots of swanky advertisements prepared by Congress People & these look like it's only Congress who deserve to rule.
hahaha..!

It has been shown that there is Narendra Modi on one side & Sonia Gandhi on the other side.
What the hell is this. Is this a tussle between Congress President & CM of Gujrat. Do the Congress not have any Political Leader to stand against Modi.

As far Gujratis I have met, they told it was only Narendra Modi in the reign of whom there has been development in every corner of Gujrat.

Congress has only one card Godhra Card.....only Godhra.....

It is Indian Media & News Channels who are striving out so hard to make this card a triumph card. But probably would not get success.

70% to 80% of the sting operations are performed against BJP, in duo of BJP-Congress fight.

Everytime these operations come in light when the Election are there.

Sonia Gandhi is a lady & News Channels are sometime creating an aroma like it's a struggle between a daring lady & an autocratic CM.

Media people are nothing different. They also wanna hike their trp ratings & to show off that they can change/make any Goverment.

It's very sad to know this...as since few years back Media has played an important role in controlling buerocrats to misuse their power. Very nice is this.
But why at the time of elections it becomes completely biased.
Why Media Advertise some party as a Dudh ki Dhuli party & the other as Ghost.

Kuchh logo ne kaha ki aisa aisa hua godhra ke time.
News channels ko sochna chaahiye ki jin logon ke comments ke base par wo decision le rahe hain wo kya Bhagwan hain ya Suprem Court hain ya Raj Harishchandra Hain.
Aisa bhi to ho sakta hai ki wo Modi ki image damage karne ki koshish kar rahe ho.
Or if you are believing one people than why not other, on the basis of verbal statements.
Tehlka is having only statements said by few people in most of the operations.
first learn to interpret buddy why they are showing modi against sonia...because the battle of words was fought between these two only...

BJP vs Congress is beacuse no third party is dominating there

[vijay]

We can't blame media only to be biased one and/or corrupted. Media is just a medium that brings forward some news or events ( right or wrong, balanced or far-fetched ... doesn't matter ). Then it's upto us mass people how we digest it. Infact, i wud like to say we are more biased than the media. Supporters of Congress will cry when there is some news against the Party and same with BJP and other parties. If news are not in favour of one's favourite party, they just blame it for being biased.

For example, just start a thread about polititics here and see how quick everyone will pull out their guns.

I won't say that Media is neutral either, almost every News channel and Newspaper have their favourites ( politically, financially and personally) but they can't mould the things in the reverse direction. Yes, they can lighten or deepen the intensity of the event or happenings, somewhat. But at least they are bringing forward SOMETHING.

It is democracy and we must feel happy that their is no censorship. We have all the resources to check the authenticty of any news. We can cross check the news from various channels and newspapers and hence analyze and conclude it by ourselves.

So, in a nutshell, all depends on us that how we analyze and interpret the information provided by the media.

Media is doing their job and let them do it. Think about ours. :)

[crsnadar]

first learn to interpret buddy why they are showing modi against sonia...because the battle of words was fought between these two only...

BJP vs Congress is beacuse no third party is dominating there

:)
Mam,
Aap to Journalist ho.
Aao se hi to sikhenge.
Waise mam I think BJP going to win again.
But this is politics, so nothing is for sure.

[fundcom]

It is not a easy thing to make an educated/rich people understand. Most of the people here are at least educated if not rich. That is why politics target poor/uneducated people.

I am not here for a particular party. I am here for Sanatan Dharma. I do not care about BJP or Congress. Though in the post It gives indication about the BJP. Both parties or all the parties will do the corruptions anyways.

I live 10,000Km away from you and have not been to India for the last 20 years. These are my feelings, which I came to know from some channels like BBC, CBC, ZEE. I used to like AajTak but my Hindi is not very good so I had a hard time. I am very firm that Sonia is anti hindu. It was confirmed when Benny Hinn made a visit to her. He was not there for a party. Search google about who "Benny Hinn and Sonia Gandhi". Narsimha litterly made her house arrest for five years. It was visible when he passed away.

Why I mentioned CNN because it is critized in the west also other than USA. CNN is just an example and some people here in this forum are swinging on this CNN. Pick other channel like FOX..NDTV.... whatever.

It is like my mother used to say -

Bina matlab koyee pani nahi pilata.
Does not mean koyee pani nahi pilata.

I was in AUS, ENG, CAN, NZ, GER. CNN is the last choice in these countries. BBC and CBC are more favourites. In AUS it was ABC and BBC.

All I can say that I did not offend anybody. I apologise if it has made anybody upset. I cannot see anything against Bharat, Bhartiya, and Sanatan Dharma. Though there are problems in themselves also. The problem is with the people not with the dharma. I still believe that hatred is never taught to us.

Only time will tell that who is right or wrong. I am not here to say that I am right. You enjoy CNN-IBN or anything you like.

Regards
SS.