Urmila ji,
Thanks a lot for noticing my disappointment and ading your kind words.Iwould like to assure you and other friends that I did not join the forum to prevail (in any manner). My earnest desire was to share new information or what was hitherto not commonly available to the friends here.Having been a teacher of Sanskrit for over forty years and lately a zealous student of Jat history it slowly became difficult for me to helplessly watch the painful spectacle of being confronted with the stereotypes of views which had outlived their validity for the simple reasons that in some cases they were based merely on imagination, (fanciful (if I could be allowed to say that) and arbitrary constructons , especially of Sanskrit texts. In other words one could reasonably call them monologues from a power house of speech. I am of the opinion that in a forum no one person could claim appropriation of all the wisdom on any subject. I would very much like to follow this principle myself. But I would certainly feel inclined to get affirmation if any point (and a crucial one for that matter) made by me if it was valid and acceptable.
I find a good lot of material on Wikipedia which cries for radical revision in light of new researches and incontrovertible findings of scholars. Many of such spots are found to be edit proof. Is it not a matter to feel disappointed about and getting dismayed? One can't help but speak in anguish when the same Wiki text is quoted as evidence to refute a point made on the basis of latest authentic material.
Any way, I once again thank you for your kindness.