Good that i am confused ?? Or is comma missing after 'Good' ?? :D
Anyways, nanomaterial toxicity is a consequence of nanotechnology; these are related and no, m not confused between nanotech and nanotoxicity. Actually, u could have framed your question in a better way.
so is this your question??
Nanomaterial toxicity is sort of 'side-effect' of nanotechnology. A consequence of nanotech.
I can understand the detrimental effects of nanotechonolgy in terms of environmental hazard, toxic waste
[which would have been a normal waste, had it not been nano] and related health issues BUT global warming ?? (and that too coz of nanotoxicity and not nanotechonlogy)
Again, how&why you think that nanotoxicity is directly related with global warming (increases or decreases GWarming)??
Do you mean that- Nanomaterial toxicity might discourage people to use nanotechnology which means use of other MICRO/MACRO-techs (less efficient ones) which further imply more global warming than that would have been by the use of nanotech??
If yes, logical felony i must say!!
:D :D Nanotoxicity is a detrimental effect!! Again what is your message here??
Enlighten me further!!
oh, dear Bhagwan! u must read posts carefully. i did put the word 'gist' which means making a 'a lil' of that '
a lot' without loosing much of the meaning.
Had you put some introduction in your first post, it would have been easier to understand your question precisely and decide if one has
something to add to your understanding.
BTW, is you keyboard broken? :o