"Not so far.
But on the one hand in your earlier post you say written words even on inscriptions are no history and on the other you suggest us to rely upon records of reed and ink kept by Pandas at Gangaghat. What to do, suggest !"
You seem to be interested in such information, so the suggestion was made. One does not have to believe all that the Pandas have written down, but, as with all the information from all other sources, why not look into this source too, there might be some useful information there also?
Why I prefer the genetic information is because it eliminates all the guess work. One might be known as an Indo Aryan and the information from all sources may be definitely pointing to that, but if the person is later proven genetically to be of the lineage of Panya or Onga, of what use all such information then be?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hindu_...s_on_Microfilm
Records on Microfilm
Starting around 1977,
[3] Hindu genealogy records were
microfilmed, and later housed at the
Genealogical Society of Utah (GSU), USA since 1981, other places in these records having records of Hindu families are
Kurukshetra,
Pehowa,
Chintpurni, Jawalapur, and
Jawalamukhi [8][9][10] The
Genealogical Society of Utah currently restricts online access to the Hindu genealogy records to members of
The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (LDS Church)
[citation needed].
http://genealogysstar.blogspot.ca/20...1194-2012.html