Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2
Results 21 to 30 of 30

Thread: Kanishka

  1. #21
    I disagree.
    Perhaps you can start a new thread on the topic for further discussion.


    Quote Originally Posted by DrRajpalSingh View Post
    Some older than this dateline records of ancient 'Aryan kings' have been deciphered in Asian countries where names of some gods sworn by the kings signing the agreement have come to light. Exact dateline of these and Bogze Kooie inscriptions would be shared after their exact verification !
    Attention seekers and attention getters are two different class of people.

  2. The Following User Says Thank You to urmiladuhan For This Useful Post:

    rajpaldular (November 21st, 2013)

  3. #22
    Quote Originally Posted by urmiladuhan View Post
    I disagree.
    Perhaps you can start a new thread on the topic for further discussion.
    Any reason for disagreement and logic for opening new thread please !

    Thanks and regards,
    History is best when created, better when re-constructed and worst when invented.

  4. #23
    Quote Originally Posted by urmiladuhan View Post
    I disagree.
    Perhaps you can start a new thread on the topic for further discussion.
    For older inscriptions, some links are:

    http://www.livescience.com/38079-can...ple-mount.html

    http://www.cais-soas.com/News/2007/N...2007/05-11.htm

    http://members.bib-arch.org/publicat...2&ArticleID=09

    and there are many more.

    thanks
    History is best when created, better when re-constructed and worst when invented.

  5. #24
    Quote Originally Posted by DrRajpalSingh View Post
    Some older than this dateline records of ancient 'Aryan kings' have been deciphered in Asian countries where names of some gods sworn by the kings signing the agreement have come to light. Exact dateline of these and Bogze Kooie inscriptions would be shared after their exact verification !
    For example see the below description:

    .Boghaz-keui Inscriptions [1360 B C] record a treaty between the Hittite king and the Mitanni king who was defeated in a battle. The Mitanni gods [Indra, Uruwna or Aruna, Miittra, Nasaattiia] alongwith Babylonian deities are invoked to protecgt the treaty. There is another document from Bogha-keui which deals with horse breeding manual and contains a series of Aryan numerals-aika, teras, panzas, satta, nav. It may be noted that the words do not exhibit the changes which distinguish Iranians from the Indian forms, indicating that the words were borrowed either from the Indians or from their ancestors before bifurcation into Indians and Iranians.
    History is best when created, better when re-constructed and worst when invented.

  6. #25
    Still another older than the Boghaz keui inscription reads:

    2. Tel-el-Amarna tablets [c. 1460 B.C.] refer to the rulers among the Mitanni on the Upper Euphrates who bore names like Atatama, Suttarna, Dusratta, which are Aryan.
    History is best when created, better when re-constructed and worst when invented.

  7. #26
    Quote Originally Posted by DrRajpalSingh View Post
    Still another older than the Boghaz keui inscription reads:

    2. Tel-el-Amarna tablets [c. 1460 B.C.] refer to the rulers among the Mitanni on the Upper Euphrates who bore names like Atatama, Suttarna, Dusratta, which are Aryan.
    The oldest of the three is :

    Kassite Documents [c. 1760 B.C.] which shows names of Indo-Aryan dieties like Surias, Marutas, Bugas.
    Moreover, it is found that these Kassites introduced the use of horse for drawing the chariots in Babylonia.
    History is best when created, better when re-constructed and worst when invented.

  8. #27
    A 3000 B.C. inscription reported from Israel:

    http://www.nbcnews.com/science/inscr...say-6C10593636

    Yes, it is yet to be read.
    History is best when created, better when re-constructed and worst when invented.

  9. #28
    This is not the topic of the thread. I shall not reply to it in this thread.


    Quote Originally Posted by DrRajpalSingh View Post
    Attention seekers and attention getters are two different class of people.

  10. #29
    Quote Originally Posted by urmiladuhan View Post
    Kindly read 9 th century B.C.E instead of 9 B.C.E as also mentioned in the original post. Hope this removes the confusion.
    Typing error. The highlighted portion should be read as millenium.
    Attention seekers and attention getters are two different class of people.

  11. The Following User Says Thank You to urmiladuhan For This Useful Post:

    DrRajpalSingh (November 22nd, 2013)

  12. #30
    Quote Originally Posted by urmiladuhan View Post
    Typing error. The highlighted portion should be read as millenium.
    Thanks, The problem stands solved !
    History is best when created, better when re-constructed and worst when invented.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •