rajpaldular (November 21st, 2013)
For older inscriptions, some links are:
http://www.livescience.com/38079-can...ple-mount.html
http://www.cais-soas.com/News/2007/N...2007/05-11.htm
http://members.bib-arch.org/publicat...2&ArticleID=09
and there are many more.
thanks
History is best when created, better when re-constructed and worst when invented.
For example see the below description:
.Boghaz-keui Inscriptions [1360 B C] record a treaty between the Hittite king and the Mitanni king who was defeated in a battle. The Mitanni gods [Indra, Uruwna or Aruna, Miittra, Nasaattiia] alongwith Babylonian deities are invoked to protecgt the treaty. There is another document from Bogha-keui which deals with horse breeding manual and contains a series of Aryan numerals-aika, teras, panzas, satta, nav. It may be noted that the words do not exhibit the changes which distinguish Iranians from the Indian forms, indicating that the words were borrowed either from the Indians or from their ancestors before bifurcation into Indians and Iranians.
History is best when created, better when re-constructed and worst when invented.
Still another older than the Boghaz keui inscription reads:
2. Tel-el-Amarna tablets [c. 1460 B.C.] refer to the rulers among the Mitanni on the Upper Euphrates who bore names like Atatama, Suttarna, Dusratta, which are Aryan.
History is best when created, better when re-constructed and worst when invented.
History is best when created, better when re-constructed and worst when invented.
A 3000 B.C. inscription reported from Israel:
http://www.nbcnews.com/science/inscr...say-6C10593636
Yes, it is yet to be read.
History is best when created, better when re-constructed and worst when invented.
DrRajpalSingh (November 22nd, 2013)