http://www.royal.gov.uk/Historyofthe.../Overview.aspx
Friend,
Would you kindly make us understand the relevance of the ' Best article' with the topic of the thread i.e. how does it connect the Ancient Central .... the Jat Blood.
http://www.jatland.com/forums/showth...965#post348965
Thanks.
History is best when created, better when re-constructed and worst when invented.
If i am not wrong and do correct me if i am wrong. The matter written on this page clearly distinguishes "Saxons"/ " Anglo Saxons" from the nordic tribes.
Rather this artikel clearly states that these tribes at some point were associated with Germanic language:
" Ethelberht's law code was the first to be written in any Germanic language and included 90 laws. His influence extended both north and south of the river Humber: his nephew became king of the East Saxons and his daughter married king Edwin of Northumbria (died 633)."
Saxons, were Scythians, if u read previous artikles.
As per "Jats", there is a direct relevance of "Scythian blood". The area, in which they reside, their migration, etc.
If u study languages, the entire concept of Indo European languages seems to be coming from these tribes. All of the area in central Europe speak same "root words" for e.g. word "Name" is "Name" in English, it becomes " Neemey" in German which is spelled as in Sanskrit, (in German "Alphabet" "E" is not spoken as same in "English" "E" is spoken as the Fruit "aam" vala "a", the word for "You" as in English is "Tu" in French" and "Du" in German, so it seems that the European languages have evolved for common root and then we can see a continuous tribal link konnekting indo-scythians )
There is a continuous continuity of people and language migration from central Asia and India. The last known migratory group being "Romas" as they are known in Europe, but many of them could be from "Scythian blood" as well because the place from where "Roma" migration took place was the exact place where ancient "Scythian" last known major migration occurred around 4th century.
Another important point is India has been a land of diversity where some cultures always maintained their identity and some part of it mixed with other cultures living in the same land, and this is like in any country through out the world.
Another important point is the date of migration. In UK, Scythians are referred around 6th century AD and in India around 2nd to 4th AD, this means, Scythians were already migrating towards Europe from central Asia before 6th century AD. Harappan civilization declined around 1800 BC, so there is big gap in between, how and who was travelling where is another question.
Before Christ remains of Scythains is another important time period that can konnekt lot of things.
Friend,
You understood right. Till something concrete is not evidenced by you, you must concentrate on finding more facts and then, not before you are satisfied with your findings,start posting on the site.
Thanks and best wishes for success of your research efforts.
History is best when created, better when re-constructed and worst when invented.
Last edited by DrRajpalSingh; October 2nd, 2013 at 06:35 PM.
History is best when created, better when re-constructed and worst when invented.
Interesting fact is the entire concept of "Sankrit" seems to have been hijacked by idol worship and brahmanical way of thought.
Interesting fact is the family names of Indo European people are more closely related with north western Bharat tribes rather then any Brahmanical people. We can still find same family names in Europe as that of North Western People of Bharat.
Interesting fact is most of the tribes have been warriors, agriculturists, herdsmen, cattle rearing people and mostly non priest people.
It seems the Indo European people were more work oriented people rather then "Brahmanical" people.
The work like craftsmanship, warriors, cattle rearing, etc.
urmiladuhan (October 3rd, 2013)
The Gupta period seems to be when brahminical ideas took deeper roots within the Hindu fold. Various iconography principles of idol carving and interpretation were written down during this time. Before the Gupta period, Jainism and Buddhism seem to be the popular religions in India. Buddha sculptures started appearing few hundred years after his death as it is believed that Buddha was against his idol worship. Even during the Mauryan times, Buddha is mainly shown in non human form i.e., as boddhi tree, as umbrella, as feet impression, as an empty throne, a rider less horse etc.
As per the available evidence, Harappa script is undeciphered and language is yet unknown and therefore cannot be said with certainty to have been precursor of Sanskrit. The chalcolithic cultures on Indian soil, post Harappa have not yielded any script so far. So, Sanskrit cannot be ascribed to chalcolithic cultures as of now. The question that may arise is how and where did Sanskrit evolve? I guess that is where secondary evidences such as family name similarity etc come into the picture.
Last edited by urmiladuhan; October 3rd, 2013 at 11:32 AM. Reason: Added undeciphered
Attention seekers and attention getters are two different class of people.
rajpaldular (October 3rd, 2013)
When i say cattle rearing people, i do not mean to say, "Yadavas " or "Gujjars". The cattle rearing Scythians it seems were different Jat clans. Lot of Jat clans can trace their ancestry to herding and cattle rearing.
Why i refute/ "yadavas and Gujars" is because yadavas were always more eastern in origin then Scythians, and Gujars extended way down mid India and Gujrat. Yadav and Gujars it seems come from a different tribes which were living close to ancient Jats.
Scythians never went beyond "Mathura" and not too far east. They were more concentrated in and around area of present day Punjab and more west in present day Pakistan and Afghanistan.
Therefore occupation or blood of these Scythians had no connection with Gujjars or Yadavas. Maybe there was some clan intermixing as it has always being happening in Indian society from ancient times.
The core blood and area of Indian Scythians seems to be areas inhabited by Jats.
Last edited by maddhan1979; October 9th, 2013 at 11:56 AM.
Sakas, and Kushans were followed by permanent settlements of large
areas of India by these people.
Herodotus reveals that the Scythians as far back as the 5th century
B.C. had political control over Central Asia and the northern
subcontinent up to the river Ganges