Results 1 to 14 of 14

Thread: Doubtful members on Jatland

  1. #1
    Wiki Moderator
    Points: 48,597, Level: 97
    Level completed: 5%, Points required for next Level: 953
    Overall activity: 90.0%
    Achievements:
    Social Referral First Class Veteran Created Album pictures 25000 Experience Points
    Awards:
    Overall Award
    Login to view details.

    Doubtful members on Jatland

    Recently I observed on Jatland Wiki by a member named Rathorejaat. He has played havoc with Dalal page. I have blocked him for one month. Admins to see.
    Laxman Burdak

  2. The Following 11 Users Say Thank You to lrburdak For This Useful Post:

    agodara (January 31st, 2015), AryanPoonia (February 16th, 2015), bishanleo2001 (January 30th, 2015), cooljat (February 1st, 2015), dndeswal (January 31st, 2015), DrRajpalSingh (January 31st, 2015), narenderkharb (February 1st, 2015), narvir (February 10th, 2015), Prikshit (January 30th, 2015), rskankara (February 1st, 2015), ssgoyat (January 31st, 2015)

  3. #2
    Quote Originally Posted by lrburdak View Post
    Recently I observed on Jatland Wiki by a member named Rathorejaat. He has played havoc with Dalal page. I have blocked him for one month. Admins to see.
    He has been temporarily banned for one month and fuller inquiry at the site administrators level [about his credentials as to find out whether he is Jat or not] will decide further course of action.

    Administrators to note for further action in the matter.
    History is best when created, better when re-constructed and worst when invented.

  4. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to DrRajpalSingh For This Useful Post:

    abhisheklakda (January 30th, 2015), bishanleo2001 (January 30th, 2015), rskankara (February 1st, 2015)

  5. #3
    My 2 cent of suggestions:-

    Wiki edit access should only be given to a person who completes atleast 2-3 years on JL.

    Exceptions: For new members.
    For Major edits, new members should be submitting their artifacts to editors to convince them to be given a temporary edit access for a week etc.
    For minor edits new members, Only after moderation their edits should be published.


    If we can put existing old members for post moderation. Why can't for a greater cause.

    Is there any periodic backup taken for wiki data?
    If someone has to kill you, he has to beat you first.

  6. The Following 12 Users Say Thank You to ssgoyat For This Useful Post:

    amitbudhwar (February 1st, 2015), AryanPoonia (February 16th, 2015), ayushkadyan (February 1st, 2015), cooljat (February 1st, 2015), lrburdak (February 8th, 2015), narvir (February 10th, 2015), prashantacmet (February 2nd, 2015), Prikshit (February 1st, 2015), rekhasmriti (January 31st, 2015), rskankara (February 1st, 2015), spdeshwal (February 16th, 2015), vikasJAT (February 19th, 2015)

  7. #4
    It is good to establish his credentials, even all JL members too... Suppose He is Jat, then? Ban is not the solution of core issue.

    I feel that the member should have editing access in temp mode ONLY. The final updation/confirmation must be through editors ONLY in all cases... Any factual publication whether popular or scientific (print or online), has review mechanism and authors are given only limited direct access....
    जाट के ठाठ हैं .....

  8. The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to rskankara For This Useful Post:

    amitbudhwar (February 1st, 2015), cooljat (February 1st, 2015), DrRajpalSingh (February 1st, 2015), narvir (February 10th, 2015), Prikshit (February 1st, 2015), spdeshwal (February 16th, 2015)

  9. #5
    Quote Originally Posted by DrRajpalSingh View Post
    He has been temporarily banned for one month and fuller inquiry at the site administrators level [about his credentials as to find out whether he is Jat or not] will decide further course of action.

    Administrators to note for further action in the matter.
    Quote Originally Posted by rskankara View Post
    Ban is not the solution of core issue.

    .
    Exactly, Banning is not a solution.

    What if, if he comes up with another new fake id and create more ruckus than before?
    Previous time, Burdak Sir were lucky to catch him !! What of this, new time?
    If someone has to kill you, he has to beat you first.

  10. The Following User Says Thank You to ssgoyat For This Useful Post:

    DrRajpalSingh (February 1st, 2015)

  11. #6
    Quote Originally Posted by ssgoyat View Post
    Exactly, Banning is not a solution.

    What if, if he comes up with another new fake id and create more ruckus than before?
    Previous time, Burdak Sir were lucky to catch him !! What of this, new time?
    Kindly suggest alternate solution !
    History is best when created, better when re-constructed and worst when invented.

  12. #7
    Quote Originally Posted by DrRajpalSingh View Post
    Kindly suggest alternate solution !
    It was already suggested above..please read again
    Become more and more innocent, less knowledgeable and more childlike. Take life as fun - because that's precisely what it is!

  13. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to prashantacmet For This Useful Post:

    DrRajpalSingh (February 2nd, 2015), ssgoyat (February 3rd, 2015)

  14. #8
    Quote Originally Posted by ssgoyat View Post
    My 2 cent of suggestions:-

    Wiki edit access should only be given to a person who completes atleast 2-3 years on JL.

    Exceptions: For new members.
    For Major edits, new members should be submitting their artifacts to editors to convince them to be given a temporary edit access for a week etc.
    For minor edits new members, Only after moderation their edits should be published.


    If we can put existing old members for post moderation. Why can't for a greater cause.

    Is there any periodic backup taken for wiki data?
    Good suggestions for consideration of admns.
    History is best when created, better when re-constructed and worst when invented.

  15. #9
    Members are requested kindly to suggest some full-proof method, if any, to keep such elements not only away from Wiki section but totally away from the site. And also let us share how to tackle such cases if they succeed in getting membership of the site by adopting wrong methods.
    Last edited by DrRajpalSingh; February 2nd, 2015 at 08:24 PM.
    History is best when created, better when re-constructed and worst when invented.

  16. The Following User Says Thank You to DrRajpalSingh For This Useful Post:

    sukhbirhooda (February 15th, 2015)

  17. #10
    Identification ID and or one time pass word SMS on mobile called OTP (may require mobile registration also) at the time of registration of members. Existing members may also be advised to update their ID norms

    Thanks

  18. The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to RKhatkar For This Useful Post:

    amitbudhwar (February 3rd, 2015), DrRajpalSingh (February 5th, 2015), lrburdak (February 8th, 2015), narvir (February 10th, 2015), Prikshit (February 3rd, 2015), spdeshwal (February 16th, 2015), sukhbirhooda (February 15th, 2015)

  19. #11
    Wiki Moderator
    Points: 48,597, Level: 97
    Level completed: 5%, Points required for next Level: 953
    Overall activity: 90.0%
    Achievements:
    Social Referral First Class Veteran Created Album pictures 25000 Experience Points
    Awards:
    Overall Award
    Login to view details.
    We keep a watch on new edits on Wiki but sometimes we are away from the site. Wiki keeps every record in history of each page. Keep on seeing Recent changes by clicking this term on navigation panel of wiki. This will update you what is being added on Wiki. For ex I click Recent changes right now we see -

    8 February 2015
    05:11 ‎Jhalrapatan ‎(diff; hist; +24) ‎ ‎Lrburdak ‎Show user links ‎ (→‎Jhalrapatan Inscription 690 A.D.) ‎
    05:08 ‎Chandrasena ‎(diff; hist; +12) ‎ ‎Lrburdak ‎Show user links ‎ ‎
    N 05:03 ‎Pirthi Raj Chohan ‎(diff; hist; +32) ‎ ‎Lrburdak ‎Show user links ‎ (Redirected page to Prithvi Raj Chauhan) ‎

    You can know who added at what time.

    When you find entries by a new member, editors name shows red entry. What we need to do is see his content. This you can find with clicking at diff .

    This is simple. Wiki moderators keep this watch. More members may do so. It is not very simple to convert a page by new member.
    Laxman Burdak

  20. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to lrburdak For This Useful Post:

    DrRajpalSingh (February 9th, 2015), narvir (February 10th, 2015), RKhatkar (February 9th, 2015), spdeshwal (February 16th, 2015), sukhbirhooda (February 15th, 2015)

  21. #12
    Dear sir; hum aapke is prayas ki atyant sarahna karte hain parntu aap site se ya to Muslim jats ko hata de ya phir unhe alag range! Aur dusri jaroori baat ye hai ki aap Hindu jaaton ko Hindu dharm we mat hatao! Aap kehte hain ki jaat pehle boddh dharm ke the lekin boddh to khud Hinduon she nikle hain Aur Hindu dharm ek saajha sanskriti hai Jo jaaton ka koi virodh nahi karti hai! Hindutv to jivan jine ka ek najriya hai aur aap issue hame mat hatiye! Him aapke is Pryas ka purjor virodh karte hain! Hum bhi brahmanvad ke virodhi hain lekin Hindu dharm brahmano ki jagir nahi hai jise hum tyag de! Hindutv bhi hamara aadhar hai jise hum 100% sweekar karte hain!

  22. The Following User Says Thank You to xmonu For This Useful Post:

    vijaypooniya (January 29th, 2017)

  23. #13
    Yehi galti kar gaye bhai, hindu dharam =Brahmanism. Ye baat samaj gaye to aur zyada kuch nahi hai samajhne ko. Sab samaj me aa jaega.
    Quote Originally Posted by xmonu View Post
    Dear sir; hum aapke is prayas ki atyant sarahna karte hain parntu aap site se ya to Muslim jats ko hata de ya phir unhe alag range! Aur dusri jaroori baat ye hai ki aap Hindu jaaton ko Hindu dharm we mat hatao! Aap kehte hain ki jaat pehle boddh dharm ke the lekin boddh to khud Hinduon she nikle hain Aur Hindu dharm ek saajha sanskriti hai Jo jaaton ka koi virodh nahi karti hai! Hindutv to jivan jine ka ek najriya hai aur aap issue hame mat hatiye! Him aapke is Pryas ka purjor virodh karte hain! Hum bhi brahmanvad ke virodhi hain lekin Hindu dharm brahmano ki jagir nahi hai jise hum tyag de! Hindutv bhi hamara aadhar hai jise hum 100% sweekar karte hain!

  24. #14
    Wiki Moderator
    Points: 48,597, Level: 97
    Level completed: 5%, Points required for next Level: 953
    Overall activity: 90.0%
    Achievements:
    Social Referral First Class Veteran Created Album pictures 25000 Experience Points
    Awards:
    Overall Award
    Login to view details.
    Quote Originally Posted by xmonu View Post
    Dear sir; hum aapke is prayas ki atyant sarahna karte hain parntu aap site se ya to Muslim jats ko hata de ya phir unhe alag range! Aur dusri jaroori baat ye hai ki aap Hindu jaaton ko Hindu dharm we mat hatao! Aap kehte hain ki jaat pehle boddh dharm ke the lekin boddh to khud Hinduon she nikle hain Aur Hindu dharm ek saajha sanskriti hai Jo jaaton ka koi virodh nahi karti hai! Hindutv to jivan jine ka ek najriya hai aur aap issue hame mat hatiye! Him aapke is Pryas ka purjor virodh karte hain! Hum bhi brahmanvad ke virodhi hain lekin Hindu dharm brahmano ki jagir nahi hai jise hum tyag de! Hindutv bhi hamara aadhar hai jise hum 100% sweekar karte hain!
    See https://www.jatland.com/home/Hindu

    Hindu (हिन्दू) refers to any person who regards themselves as culturally, ethnically, or religiously adhering to aspects of Brahmanical Hinduism.


    The name Hindu was first a geographical name, not a religious one, and it originated in the languages of Iran, not of India.

    भारत के प्राचीन ग्रंथों रामायण और महाभारत में हिंदु या हिंदुत्व शब्द नहीं है.
    Last edited by lrburdak; June 26th, 2018 at 12:36 PM.
    Laxman Burdak

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •