{Bhai apni life se dekho ... sab cheejen apne pe lagu karo ... kahin par bhi kya tum reservation se affect hue ho}?
Yup Hooda, I have missed Medical college Rohtak seat by a very narrow margin but then what Should I start whinning about that reservation is the sole cause.Whatever Dev Dahiya has summed up says about that true aspects of backwardness of jats in Haryana.Tell me there are more than 10,000 members of this site, if one successful person starts helping their own friends and in circle who will need the reservation.There is no big 'jaadu ka chirag' other than this.How many people/jats boys you have brought up from village and fixed them in services through your contacts?
By the way here is the recommendations of NCBC commission where your own JAT MAHASABHA did wrong to the community when there was hearing for reservation, they didnt even fill up the questionarre...Have a look at the news report..
P.S. Krishnan, former NCBC Member-Secretary and a member of the NCBC Bench that heard the case in 1997, explained that a survey would be required only when socio-historical evidence was found to be inadequate to decide the matter.
In the case of the Jats of Rajasthan, the evidence was overwhelmingly in their favour, he observed.
Answering the criticism that the NCBC did not find evidence of Jats’ educational backwardness or their inadequate representation in the services as required by the relevant constitutional provisions, he said: “Once social backwardness is established, educational backwardness and inadequate representation in the services could be justifiably presumed.”
It is significant that the same NCBC had rejected requests for conferring OBC status on the Jats of Uttar Pradesh, Haryana, Delhi and Madhya Pradesh. In the case of Haryana, the request-making body, the Haryana Jat Sabha of Hissar, did not even fill up the NCBC’s questionnaire, and this went against them. The NCBC rejected the findings of the Gurnam Singh Commission in Haryana suggesting that Jats were socially more backward than many of the Scheduled Castes, including those who were traditionally associated with scavenging. The NCBC opined that the Jats of Delhi had the advantage of urban and metropolitan residences and of the sharp rise in the value of property and, therefore, were not socially backward.
The NCBC observed that in western Uttar Pradesh large areas were under the “Bhaichara” dispensation, where land was allotted on the principle of equality. After considering a few scholarly works, it concluded that the Jats of Uttar Pradesh were socially advanced. Similarly, it rejected the claim of the Jats of Madhya Pradesh for OBC status, on the grounds that they were of Bharatpur origin and that the Jats of Bharatpur in Rajasthan were found to be advanced like the Jats of western Uttar Pradesh, Haryana and Punjab
This is the link..
http://www.hinduonnet.com/thehindu/f...0510109100.htm